Morgan Stanley: Half of US Stocks Down 20% Since June
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
AiX — Free Expert Advisor
Trades XAUUSD on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. AiX is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Morgan Stanley said on 2 October 2026 that more than half of the stocks in the Russell 3000 index have fallen at least 20% since June, even as the S&P 500 holds near record levels. The bank's chief US equity strategist, Mike Wilson, put the headline index at about 19 times earnings, back near its March lows, while median stock earnings growth runs in the mid-teens. Wilson framed the Treasury market, not earnings, as the swing factor for US equities over roughly the next month.
Context — Why the S&P 500 Is Masking a Weak US Stock Market
The gap between the index and the average stock is the story. Wilson argued that the divergence shows investors are not complacent about the risks facing equities, because valuations have already absorbed much of the bad news. The S&P 500 trades on about 19 times earnings, near its March lows, against median stock earnings growth in the mid-teens. That combination implies the market has priced a lot of damage into the average company while the index itself sits near records.
This is not a new theme from Morgan Stanley. In March, Wilson warned that the average stock had suffered a stealth correction while the index sat near records, with the gap between the best and worst performing S&P 500 members the widest in two decades. In July, the bank compared the market's narrow leadership with 2021, when investors crowded into quality megacaps ahead of the 2022 rate-hike sell-off. The pattern the bank describes has now run for most of the year.
What changed to bring the question to a head is the bond market. US 10-year Treasury yields touched their highest level since 2002 this week before easing, as surging oil prices linked to the Iran war and a Federal Reserve on a tightening path pushed borrowing costs higher. Wilson recently flagged the risk of a dip of around 7% in the S&P 500 toward 7,100 as rising energy prices and bond turbulence tightened financial conditions, before a rebound into year-end.
The catalyst chain runs from oil to yields to equity breadth. Energy-driven inflation from the Iran war has been a key driver of the bond volatility Wilson highlights, and that volatility now sits between two possible outcomes for US equities. A calmer bond market would favour a catch-up rally in small caps, cyclicals and the equal-weight index. Persistent yield swings point to a softer S&P 500 as the index falls toward the average stock.
Data — What the Numbers Show
The report's central figures are breadth and valuation. More than half of Russell 3000 members are down at least 20% since June. The S&P 500 trades on about 19 times earnings, near its March lows. Median stock earnings growth is running in the mid-teens. Those three numbers describe a market where the typical company has already corrected while the index has not.
The before-and-after here is the valuation reset. The S&P 500 multiple has moved from its highs back to the March low of roughly 19 times earnings, even as median earnings growth holds in the mid-teens. A lower multiple on stable growth implies the market has de-rated the average stock, not just the index.
The peer comparison the bank supplies is historical rather than cross-sectional. Wilson has compared current narrow leadership with 2021, when investors crowded into quality megacaps ahead of the 2022 rate-hike sell-off, and has called the March gap between the best and worst S&P 500 performers the widest in two decades. Both comparisons point the same way: concentration at the index level has repeatedly preceded a broader reckoning.
Analysis — What It Means for Markets and Sectors
The second-order effect runs through financial conditions. If the 10-year yield keeps swinging, the cost of capital for smaller, more levered companies stays elevated, which pressures exactly the cohort already down 20%. Cyclicals and small caps carry more floating-rate debt and more refinancing risk than asset-light large caps, so they are the first to feel a tightening move and the first to rally if yields settle.
Morgan Stanley's positioning follows that logic. The bank continues to favour large-cap quality stocks, particularly asset-light companies with rising earnings estimates, and would add exposure to riskier stocks if the index falls. That is a defensive middle path: own the companies least exposed to a bond-market shock, and buy the beaten-down cohort only on index weakness.
The counter-argument is that the breadth damage is already the correction. Both Morgan Stanley and Citadel hold a constructive fourth-quarter view, with both houses seeing much of the damage already done beneath the surface. If that is right, the average stock has absorbed the shock and the index is the laggard, not the leader. The risk to that view is a further leg higher in yields, which would hit the already-corrected cohort hardest and force the index to converge downward.
Wilson also believes consensus is underestimating the margin gains that AI-focused companies stand to make, and he views the market as being in a mid-cycle phase, with strong earnings growth offsetting lower valuations. That is the bull case for the index holding its ground while breadth recovers.
Outlook — What to Watch Next
The swing factor is bond volatility. If volatility in bonds persists, Wilson expects the index and the wider market to converge somewhere between their current levels, though still with a strong finish to the year. If bond volatility eases, he expects breadth to catch up with the index, lifting both. The 10-year yield's push to its highest level since 2002 before easing is the level to watch.
Oil is the second catalyst. Energy-driven inflation from the Iran war has fed the bond volatility Wilson flags, so a sustained move in crude would transmit directly into yields and then into equity breadth. The Federal Reserve's tightening path is the third input, with policy expectations setting the floor under borrowing costs.
The level Wilson named is the S&P 500's dip risk of around 7% toward 7,100, before a rebound into year-end. A move toward that level would be the trigger he describes for adding riskier stocks. A calmer bond market would instead favour small caps, cyclicals and the equal-weight index catching up.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does it mean that half of US stocks are down 20% since June?
It means the typical US company has already experienced a bear-market-level drawdown while the S&P 500 has not. Morgan Stanley reads that gap as evidence investors are not complacent, because valuations have already absorbed much of the bad news. The index is being held up by a narrow group of quality large caps, while the broader Russell 3000 has corrected.
Why is the bond market the swing factor for US equities right now?
Wilson frames Treasury volatility, not earnings, as what decides whether the index falls to meet the average stock or the average stock recovers to meet the index. US 10-year yields touched their highest level since 2002 this week before easing, driven by oil-linked inflation from the Iran war and a Fed on a tightening path. Calmer yields favour breadth; persistent swings favour a softer index.
What happens to small caps and cyclicals if bond volatility eases?
Morgan Stanley expects breadth to catch up with the index in that scenario, lifting both. Small caps, cyclicals and the equal-weight index would be the primary beneficiaries, because they carry more refinancing risk and have already fallen furthest. The bank would still favour asset-light, quality large caps with rising estimates as its core position.
Bottom Line
Morgan Stanley says the average US stock has already corrected, and the Treasury market now decides whether the S&P 500 follows it down.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Trade XAUUSD on autopilot — free Expert Advisor
AiX is our free MetaTrader 5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. XAUUSD breakout engine.
Trade 800+ global stocks & ETFs
Start TradingSponsored
Ready to trade the markets?
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.