Sherritt Moves to Dissolve Cuba Ventures, Exiting After 25 Years
0h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
sherritt-internationalcuba-ventures
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Sherritt International announced on 15 May 2026 that it has initiated proceedings to dissolve the Moa Joint Venture in Cuba. The move severs a 25-year-old partnership with the island nation's government, transferring full control of the nickel and cobalt mining operation. The dissolution will result in Sherritt receiving a final settlement of approximately $100 million in cash and assets, according to company disclosures. The strategic exit marks a definitive end to its Cuban operations, first established in the 1990s.
The dissolution concludes a multi-decade entanglement with Cuba's state-owned entity, General Nickel Company, against a backdrop of persistent geopolitical friction and sanctions. The last comparable corporate exit from a major Cuban joint venture was Melia Hotels ceasing management of four properties in 2023, citing operational challenges and financial constraints. The current macro backdrop features a nickel price of $19,800 per tonne, struggling to rebound from a 40% slump from 2022 highs. Sherritt’s decision was triggered by an accumulation of catalysts. Prolonged operational disputes, blocked profit repatriation, and the Biden administration's refusal to lift key Title III sanctions under the Helms-Burton Act in 2025 made the venture commercially untenable. The final push came from activist shareholder Engine No. 1, which secured board seats in late 2025 and demanded a strategic pivot towards North American assets.
The Moa JV dissolution unwinds a core asset representing 31% of Sherritt’s total revenue in 2025. Sherritt’s share of the venture’s 2025 production was 16,500 tonnes of finished nickel and 1,750 tonnes of finished cobalt. That output accounted for roughly 2% of the global Class 2 nickel supply. The following table compares Sherritt's Cuban exposure before and after the dissolution:
| Metric | Pre-Dissolution (2025) | Post-Dissolution (Proj. 2027) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Cuban Assets as % of Total | 45% | 0% |
| Nickel Production | 16.5k tonnes | 0 tonnes |
| Cobalt Production | 1.75k tonnes | 0 tonnes |
| Geopolitical Risk Premium (est.) | 350 bps | ~0 bps |
Sherritt's market capitalization stood at C$450 million before the announcement. The settlement provides immediate liquidity of ~$100m against a net debt position of C$320 million. For context, Sherritt’s 2025 EBITDA of C$85 million lagged peers like Vale, which reported Q1 nickel EBITDA margins of 24% versus Sherritt's 12%.
The dissolution is a net positive for Sherritt's credit profile but creates a supply vacuum in the Western battery metals chain. Sherritt's projected debt-to-EBITDA ratio could improve from 3.8x to below 2.5x post-liquidity injection, a key metric for credit rating reviews. Direct beneficiaries are other Western nickel sulphide producers with expansion potential, like Vale (VALE) and BHP Group (BHP), which could capture market share. Indirect winners are cobalt refineries outside China, such as those operated by Umicore (UMI), seeking non-DRC sourced material. The primary counter-argument is that Sherritt loses a low-cost production base; Moa's cash cost of $4.50/lb was below the industry average of $6.00/lb. This could pressure long-term profitability unless its remaining Fort Saskatchewan refinery secures new feed contracts. Market positioning shows short covering in Sherritt bonds, with inflows shifting towards mid-cap nickel developers like FPX Nickel (FPX.V) and Tartisan Nickel (TN.CN), which are seen as more geopolitically secure plays.
Immediate catalysts include the binding arbitration outcome under the UNCITRAL rules, expected by Q3 2026, and Sherritt's Q2 2026 earnings call on 7 August 2026 for updated guidance. Investors should watch the 50-day moving average on Sherritt’s share price (S.TO) at C$0.32, a break above which could signal sustained re-rating. A key level for the nickel market is the $20,500/tonne resistance; a sustained break above it would indicate the Moa supply removal is tightening the market. The longer-term watchpoint is whether the Cuban government successfully finds a new partner, with Chinese state-backed China Minmetals cited as the most likely candidate in 2027.
The removal of roughly 16,500 tonnes of Sherritt's nickel production reduces non-Chinese, non-Indonesian sulphide supply by about 2%. This could tighten the market for intermediate products used in Class 1 nickel sulfate production for EV batteries. However, the overall impact may be muted as Indonesian laterite nickel production continues to expand rapidly, adding over 300,000 tonnes of new capacity annually. The greater effect is geopolitical, reducing Western dependence on a Cuban supply chain subject to US sanctions.
Sherritt's exit is the largest and most complex since the 1990s, involving the dissolution of a 50/50 equity joint venture rather than a simple asset sale. It is more significant than hotel operators like Melia or Iberostar ending management contracts, as it involves the full transfer of a capital-intensive mining operation. The closest precedent is the gradual withdrawal of Spanish oil company Repsol from Cuban offshore exploration blocks after 2015 due to poor results and sanctions, but that did not involve an active producing asset.
Full ownership and operational control revert to Cuba's state-owned General Nickel Company (GNC). GNC will need to secure new technical partners and capital to maintain production at current rates, as Sherritt provided proprietary processing technology and international marketing. Historical precedent from the mining sector suggests a likely transition period of 12-18 months with reduced output, followed by a potential partnership announcement with a Chinese, Russian, or Vietnamese state enterprise to provide the required expertise and investment.
Sherritt's Cuban exit removes a major geopolitical risk discount but sacrifices a core, low-cost production base in a strategic commodity.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Trade gold, silver & commodities — zero commission
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
