Pimco Warns Data Center Junk Debt Is Splitting into Two Markets
1h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
high-yield-bondsdata-centers
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Pacific Investment Management Co. urged caution in the high-yield data center debt market on 28 May 2026. The firm’s Head of Leveraged Finance, Mohit Mittal, identified a growing divergence between financially strong operators and speculative projects. This split occurs during a historic issuance boom for debt financing artificial intelligence and cloud computing infrastructure. Investors must now differentiate between issuers with investment-grade trajectories and those facing potential distress.
The current credit cycle mirrors the fiber-optic network build-out of the late 1990s. Between 1998 and 2001, high-yield issuance for telecom infrastructure surpassed $100 billion before a wave of defaults wiped out over 40% of the sector's market value. Today's data center boom is similarly fueled by a transformative technology, with AI demand acting as the primary catalyst. Power availability and access to cutting-edge chips have become critical differentiators for project viability.
Global corporate high-yield bond yields averaged 7.8% in May 2026, compressing from 8.5% at the start of the year. This hunt for yield has driven capital toward specialized infrastructure projects like data centers. The fundamental shift is the bifurcation of risk. Projects backed by large technology firms or seasoned operators with secured power contracts are distancing themselves from speculative builds lacking anchor tenants.
This warning emerges as the Federal Reserve maintains a higher-for-longer interest rate stance. The last Fed meeting on 14 May 2026 signaled only one potential rate cut for the remainder of the year. This monetary policy environment increases refinancing risks for highly leveraged projects that borrowed during the low-rate era, making Pimco’s timing particularly relevant for credit portfolios.
Data center high-yield bond issuance reached $25 billion year-to-date through May 2026, a 75% increase compared to the same period in 2025. The average yield spread for these bonds over Treasuries is 425 basis points. However, this average masks a wide dispersion. Top-tier issuer spreads have tightened to 275 bps, while lower-tier spreads have widened to 600 bps.
| Metric | Top-Tier Issuers | Lower-Tier Issuers |
|---|---|---|
| Yield Spread (vs Treasuries) | 275 bps | 600 bps |
| Avg. Debt/EBITDA | 4.5x | 8.0x |
| Project Pre-Lease Level | >80% | <30% |
The disparity in use is stark. Top-tier operators maintain debt-to-EBITDA ratios near 4.5x, while speculative projects exceed 8.0x. For comparison, the broader US high-yield market average is 5.2x. Default risk is concentrated in projects with pre-lease levels below 30%, which face immense pressure to secure anchor tenants amid rising construction costs. Electricity consumption for AI data centers is projected to triple by 2030, creating a clear divide between projects with guaranteed power and those competing on the spot market.
The bifurcation creates clear winners and losers. Established real estate investment trusts (REITs) with strong balance sheets, such as Digital Realty Trust (DLR) and Equinix (EQIX), are well-positioned to act as consolidators, acquiring distressed assets. Their investment-grade ratings provide access to cheaper capital, giving them a significant cost advantage over highly leveraged private developers.
Specialized semiconductor and hardware providers like Nvidia (NVDA) and Arista Networks (ANET) benefit indirectly. A strong and expanding data center ecosystem directly fuels demand for their products, regardless of the underlying project's financial health. Conversely, smaller, unproven data center developers relying on junk debt could face solvency issues if they fail to secure major cloud clients, potentially leading to restructurings.
A key risk to this analysis is the possibility of a broader AI demand slowdown. If enterprise adoption of generative AI plateaus, even well-capitalized projects could face occupancy challenges, compressing returns across the entire sector. Current market positioning shows institutional investors adding exposure to investment-grade infrastructure debt while shorting the CCC-rated segment of the data center bond market through credit default swaps. Flows into dedicated data center ETFs have slowed, indicating a more selective approach.
The next significant catalyst is the 18 June 2026 Federal Open Market Committee meeting. Any hawkish shift in the dot plot could widen high-yield spreads further, exacerbating the funding gap for lower-tier issuers. Earnings reports from major cloud providers in late July, including Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud, will provide critical data points on AI revenue growth and future capital expenditure plans.
Monitor the 10-year Treasury yield, with a breach above 4.50% likely to trigger a reassessment of financing costs for all leveraged projects. The iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is testing a key support level at $75; a sustained break below could signal broader risk-off sentiment spilling into the niche data center debt market. Power grid reliability reports during the summer 2026 heatwaves will also be crucial for assessing operational risks.
Retail investors holding high-yield bond ETFs or mutual funds should review their fund's exposure to the specialty finance and infrastructure sectors. While direct holdings of individual data center bonds are unlikely, concentrated bets by fund managers could impact overall returns. The divergence means passive high-yield funds may experience increased volatility as the market reprices risk, making active management potentially more important for navigating the sector-specific credit selection.
The current cycle involves more substantial pre-existing demand from established cloud computing giants, unlike the speculative telecom build-out. However, parallels exist in the reliance on abundant, cheap capital and the winner-take-all dynamics. A key difference is the physical constraint of electrical power, which was less of a limiting factor for fiber networks. This power dynamic may lead to a more rapid consolidation among data center operators compared to the protracted telecom collapse.
Over the past two decades, the default rate for US high-yield infrastructure projects has averaged 3.2%, slightly below the overall high-yield market average of 3.7%. However, during stress periods like the 2008 financial crisis, infrastructure default rates spiked to 12.5%, demonstrating their vulnerability to financing shocks. Current projections for the lower-tier data center segment suggest default rates could approach 8-10% if interest rates remain elevated through 2027.
Investors must apply intense due diligence to separate viable data center projects from speculative ones in the high-yield market.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Position yourself for the macro moves discussed above
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.