Grantham Warns AI Bubble Will Crash U.S. Stocks, S&P to Halve
0h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
jeremy-granthamai-stock-bubble
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Jeremy Grantham warns an epic crash is imminent for U.S. equities, fueled by a speculative bubble in artificial intelligence stocks. The co-founder of GMO issued the stark warning to investors on 26 June 2026, urging them to flee U.S. markets. Grantham's historical analysis points to a potential 50% decline in the S&P 500 from its peak. His view identifies the current AI investment mania as the primary catalyst for a major correction, similar to the dot-com bubble's collapse.
Grantham's warning arrives as the S&P 500 trades near all-time highs, driven significantly by the magnificent seven mega-cap technology stocks. The Shiller Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings (CAPE) ratio for the S&P 500 exceeds 34. This valuation level is surpassed only by the peaks of 1929 and the dot-com bubble of 2000. Current market concentration, where the top ten stocks represent over 33% of the S&P 500's total market capitalization, mirrors prior speculative peaks.
The last major super-bubble identified by Grantham was the dot-com bubble, which peaked in March 2000. The subsequent bear market saw the Nasdaq Composite index fall 78% over 30 months. The S&P 500 declined 49% from peak to trough. Grantham's framework identifies three prior "super-bubbles" in U.S. equities: 1929, 2000, and 2008. Each was followed by a decline exceeding 45%.
The current catalyst is the massive capital inflow into AI-related companies and infrastructure. Grantham argues the narrative of limitless AI productivity gains has detached stock prices from underlying corporate earnings growth. Market breadth remains weak, with a small cohort of AI-focused stocks driving most index gains. This divergence signals underlying fragility common at major market tops.
Grantham's warning is anchored by concrete valuation and flow metrics. The S&P 500's forward price-to-earnings ratio stands at 22.4, compared to its 25-year average of 16.8. The index dividend yield is 1.3%, near historic lows. The total market capitalization of U.S. equities relative to U.S. Gross Domestic Product, a measure of overall market valuation, exceeds 190%. This compares to a long-term average near 100%.
Grantham's firm, GMO, forecasts real returns for U.S. large-cap equities at -3.7% annualized over the next seven years. This contrasts with a forecast of 7.2% annualized real returns for emerging market value stocks. The firm's models show U.S. equities are priced for perfection, leaving little margin for earnings disappointment or higher interest rates.
The concentration in AI beneficiaries is extreme. For example, NVIDIA Corporation's market capitalization surpassed $3.8 trillion in June 2026. Its price-to-sales ratio exceeds 35. The combined market cap of the top five AI-focused U.S. tech stocks now exceeds $15 trillion. This represents more than 25% of the total U.S. stock market's value.
A steep market correction would create pronounced winners and losers across sectors. Highly-valued AI and technology stocks like NVDA, AMD, and SMCI face the greatest downside risk due to their elevated multiples. Conversely, sectors with low starting valuations and strong cash flows, such as energy (XLE) and value-oriented international equities, could demonstrate relative resilience. Grantham specifically highlights emerging market value stocks as a potential haven for capital fleeing U.S. risk.
The primary counter-argument to Grantham's thesis is the transformative potential of generative AI to boost productivity and corporate profits fundamentally. Proponents argue that current valuations, while high, are justified by a forthcoming leap in earnings growth. They also note that corporate balance sheets are generally strong, and the Federal Reserve has signaled a potential easing cycle, which could provide a liquidity backstop for equities.
Positioning data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shows asset managers hold significant net long positions in S&P 500 futures. Meanwhile, hedge funds and other leveraged funds have increased their net short exposure in recent weeks. Flow data indicates retail investors continue pouring money into broad-market index funds and AI-themed ETFs, while some institutional investors are quietly rotating into defensive sectors and cash.
Investors should monitor the second-quarter 2026 corporate earnings season, which begins in mid-July. Guidance from mega-cap tech leaders on AI capital expenditure and monetization will be critical. Any sign of slowing investment or delayed revenue recognition could trigger the initial sell-off Grantham anticipates. The next Federal Open Market Committee meeting on 30 July will provide an updated dot plot and commentary on the policy path.
Key technical levels for the S&P 500 include its 200-day moving average, currently near 5,200, as a primary support. A sustained break below this level on rising volume would confirm a change in the primary trend. On the upside, resistance is seen at the recent all-time high near 5,800. The CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) trading persistently above 20 would signal rising investor fear and confirm deteriorating market breadth.
Further catalysts include the July jobs report on 4 July and the Consumer Price Index reading for June, released on 11 July. Inflation data that surprises to the upside could push out expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, removing a key pillar of support for high-multiple growth stocks. Monitoring flows into and out of major technology ETFs like XLK and QQQ will provide real-time sentiment data.
Retail investors concerned about a major correction should first review their asset allocation to ensure it aligns with their long-term risk tolerance and time horizon. Options include rebalancing a portfolio away from over-concentrated U.S. growth positions, increasing exposure to undervalued international or value equities, and raising cash levels gradually to preserve capital and create dry powder for future opportunities. Directly attempting to time the market's peak is notoriously difficult, so a disciplined, phased approach is often recommended over an immediate, all-out exit.
Grantham correctly identified the dot-com bubble as it formed in the late 1990s and warned of its impending burst, though the peak arrived later than he initially expected. He also warned of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis in advance, citing a bubble in U.S. housing prices. However, he has also issued warnings that preceded extended periods of market gains, such as cautioning about elevated valuations in 2014 and 2017. His calls are best viewed as probabilistic assessments of extreme risk based on valuation, not precise market-timing signals.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Trade 800+ global stocks & ETFs
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.