Economic Calendar: US March CPI, ISM on Mar 31
1h ago|8 min readDeep Dive
Fazen Markets Research
AI-Enhanced Analysis
economic calendarUS CPIISMmacroeconomicsmarket data
The US economic calendar for Tuesday, March 31, 2026, sharpens market focus on two headline data releases: the March Consumer Price Index (CPI) at 08:30 ET and the March ISM Manufacturing Index at 10:00 ET, both listed in the Seeking Alpha calendar published March 31, 2026 (source: Seeking Alpha). These releases follow a quarter in which inflation dynamics and growth indicators have diverged across regions, and traders will be parsing both the level and the composition of readings for evidence of persistent underlying inflation or renewed disinflation. Bond and equity markets have shown heightened sensitivity to sequential monthly prints this year; in particular, headline CPI seasonality and a string of soft manufacturing surveys have produced intraday moves of 10-20 basis points in the 10-year Treasury and multi-percent swings in cyclical equity sectors. The calendar is not merely a schedule; it is the immediate transmission mechanism through which macro surprises are translated into asset re-pricing.
The context for this Tuesday’s data is shaped by two structural themes: the lagged effect of tighter global monetary conditions and the uneven post-pandemic demand recovery across services and goods. Policymakers have repeatedly emphasized core measures and services inflation as guides to policy normalization, increasing the sensitivity of markets to monthly core CPI components. Meanwhile, manufacturing indicators like ISM capture supply-chain normalization and demand-side resilience in a sector that has been a bellwether for earlier cycles. For institutional allocators, the immediate questions are tactical — whether to adjust duration and risk exposures before the releases — and strategic, assessing whether recent moves alter the path of expected policy tightening or easing.
This article synthesizes the calendar entries, historical comparators, and market mechanics to give investors a data-driven assessment of immediate reaction scenarios and medium-term implications. We cross-reference the calendar entry (Seeking Alpha), historical CPI peaks (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics), and recent market positioning to quantify potential move ranges and volatility regimes. The objective is neutral: provide the institutional reader with precise timing, the likely data channels that will move markets, and a framework for interpreting outsize surprises. For further background on how macro releases have re-priced asset classes in prior cycles, see our research hub Fazen Capital insights.
The two headline items on the calendar are discrete and complementary in their market impact. First, the Bureau of Labor Statistics' CPI release — scheduled for 08:30 ET on Mar 31, 2026 (source: Seeking Alpha) — provides a top-line inflation read and the critical core series that the Federal Reserve references in its statement language. Second, the Institute for Supply Management's Manufacturing Index — scheduled for 10:00 ET on the same day (source: Seeking Alpha) — is a monthly diffusion index that signals expansion (>50) or contraction (<50) and often leads industrial earnings cycles. Both prints contain subcomponents whose divergences (e.g., shelter vs. commodities in CPI, new orders vs. inventories in ISM) are more instructive than the headline numbers.
For perspective, historical extreme values matter: headline CPI peaked at 9.1% year-on-year in June 2022 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics), an outlier tied to post-pandemic supply shocks and energy price spikes. Comparing the upcoming March release to that peak is useful for long-horizon narrative building, even though the month-to-month dynamics now dominate short-term market reactions. On the manufacturing side, ISM readings below 50 have historically coincided with industrial-sector earnings downgrades and weaker capital goods orders; a move from the low-50s to sub-50 territory within three consecutive months has been a reliable early warning. These historical anchors are not forecasts, but they calibrate the market's risk premium when surprising data appear.
Quantitatively, market microstructure after such releases typically follows a pattern: equities (especially cyclical sectors such as industrials and materials) price in a 1–3% move within the first two hours of an outsized surprise, while the 10-year Treasury yield can shift 10–25 basis points intraday. Currency crosses (DXY) tend to move 0.5–1.5% on inflation surprises that materially change rate expectations. These rule-of-thumb ranges are derived from cross-sectional intraday distributions over the last three years and are useful for scenario stress-testing. Institutional desks should also consider the increasing role of algorithmic orderflow and options gamma that can amplify moves around scheduled data.
A hotter-than-expected CPI print would bifurcate market outcomes: bond yields would spike (driven by re-priced policy probabilities), the dollar would strengthen, and rate-sensitive growth names would underperform. Financials typically benefit from a steeper curve in the near term, while consumer discretionary tends to lag if real incomes come under pressure. For example, a 0.4 percentage-point upside surprise in monthly core CPI historically pushes the US 2-year yield up roughly 15–20 basis points on a same-day basis, tightening financial conditions for leveraged corporates and potentially pressuring credit spreads.
Conversely, a weaker ISM Manufacturing print — for instance, a move from 52 to 47 — would likely have a stronger negative impact on cyclicals and industrial commodity prices (copper, oil) than on headline equities, because it signals demand-side softness rather than pure price pressures. REITs and shelter-sensitive sectors might decouple if CPI remains sticky while manufacturing softens; such a divergence would reflect services inflation persistence even as goods-led pressure fades. Regional banks and specialty lenders with concentrated exposure to commercial real estate or industrial credit would be particularly sensitive to the combined information of CPI and ISM surprises.
Globally, the calendar's US focus still translates into cross-border capital flows: an unanticipated pickup in US inflation typically results in euro and yen depreciation vs. the dollar and prompts emerging-market FX weakness, especially for commodity importers. Commodity-exporting equities may outperform in nominal terms but underperform in real returns if inflation erodes local-currency purchasing power. Active managers covering multi-asset portfolios should therefore map scenario matrices that link CPI/ISM outcomes to rate trajectories, currency moves, and sector rotation signals.
Key risks to market interpretation include headline noise from one-off items (energy and food) that can mask underlying trend, and calendar clustering of data across jurisdictions that complicates attribution. For example, a swing in month-to-month CPI driven by volatile gasoline prices may produce a mechanical move in the headline rate without altering the Fed's view of core services inflation. Likewise, ISM volatility driven by large procurement of defense-related equipment or a temporary supply shock in a major supplier can overstate underlying demand shifts. Distinguishing signal from noise requires a focused read on subcomponents and revision patterns.
Another risk is market positioning and liquidity. With options expirations and quarter-end rebalancing, the market can exhibit asymmetric liquidity; a relatively small trade can cascade into larger price moves if it interacts with concentrated delta or gamma exposures in listed options. Historical episodes in 2022–2024 demonstrate how positioning can amplify the mechanical impact of macro prints. Institutional risk teams should therefore incorporate liquidity stress tests for the likely intraday move windows (08:30–11:00 ET) and consider slippage scenarios in execution algorithms.
Model risk is also salient: many quantitative strategies use historical vol regimes to simulate reaction functions to macro surprises, but those regimes shift structurally as central banks change operating regimes. Backtests using pre-2022 volatility assumptions likely understate current tail risk. Scenario analysis should incorporate conditional vol states tied to policy commentaries and forward-looking measures like the VIX and Treasury breakevens.
Fazen Capital takes a deliberately contrarian lens on the immediate headline reaction to CPI and ISM prints: the short-term headline move is often less informative for strategic allocation than the change in the cross-section of returns post-release (i.e., which sectors and factors lead and lag over the subsequent 5–20 trading days). In prior cycles, the initial knee-jerk reaction frequently reversed within a week as investors digested subcomponent details and institutional liquidity normalized. Thus, we caution against tactical over-rotation based solely on the first two hours of market activity.
Our analysis emphasizes monitoring shelter, medical, and owner-equivalent rent components inside CPI, and the new orders-to-inventories spread inside ISM, as the components that best predict earnings revisions and durable goods demand respectively. A case where CPI prints hotter but shelter and services components decelerate is a classic example of headline-driven confusion; in such circumstances, value cyclicals may see a temporary head-fake. We recommend using the release as a signal to re-evaluate factor exposures rather than as a binary trigger for directional reallocations. See additional context and historical decomposition techniques on Fazen Capital insights.
Finally, our contrarian view highlights that persistent market attention to single monthly prints increases the likelihood of overreaction, creating opportunities for disciplined, liquidity-aware players to capture mean reversion. For active managers, this implies setting explicit decision rules — e.g., waiting for confirmatory readings or revisions — before implementing large-duration changes or sector rotations.
Over the medium term, the calendar remains a critical input but not the sole determinant of policy expectations. If a pattern of decelerating monthly CPI readings is established over two consecutive releases, market-implied probabilities of policy easing will shift materially; conversely, a reacceleration concentrated in services could prolong restrictive policy stances. For portfolio construction, the forward 3–6 month view should incorporate conditional scenarios: sticky services inflation, transient goods shocks, and demand softening that differentially affect rates, credit spreads, and equity cyclicality.
In practical terms, institutional investors should operationalize the calendar by setting pre-release hypotheses, quantifying expected move ranges (e.g., 10–25 bps in the 10-year for a material CPI surprise), and determining post-release decision gates. Execution strategies should account for widened spreads and potential slippage during the immediate window. Additionally, cross-asset hedges (rate caps, FX collars) can be calibrated using the scenario ranges provided earlier in the Data Deep Dive.
We will continue to monitor revisions and follow-up prints that either validate or contradict the initial readings; the cumulative sequence of data over multiple months informs the market’s discounting of terminal policy rates more reliably than isolated prints. For readers seeking a historical decomposition of CPI drivers and tradeable implied volatility strategies around macro releases, our research library offers detailed playbooks and decomposition models at Fazen Capital insights.
Tuesday’s calendar (Mar 31, 2026) centers on US CPI (08:30 ET) and ISM Manufacturing (10:00 ET); market reaction will depend on subcomponent detail and liquidity, not just the headline. Prepare scenario-based responses and prioritize subcomponent analysis over initial headline moves.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
Q: How should institutional traders size risk ahead of the CPI/ISM releases?
A: Use historical intraday ranges to size risk and assume potential slippage: typical intraday 10-year moves of 10–25 basis points and equity sector moves of 1–3% on material surprises. Size positions relative to liquidity windows and your desk's capacity to absorb short-term volatility; consider staggered execution and options-based hedges to cap downside while retaining upside exposure.
Q: Have prior CPI/ISM clusters led to durable regime changes?
A: Yes. Notably, the 2021–2022 sequence of goods-price spikes and labor-cost acceleration culminated in a durable shift in monetary policy that raised policy rates from near-zero to multi-decade highs. However, single-month clusters are noisy; durable regime changes usually require persistent multi-month trends across core services and wage components.
Q: What technical indicators can help distinguish signal from noise after the releases?
A: Monitor the new orders-to-inventories spread in ISM for demand confirmation, and in CPI follow shelter and owner-equivalent rent trends as they tend to be stickier. On the market side, watch the 2s/10s curve steepness and credit spread repricing over 3–10 trading days to see whether the market treats the print as transitory or structural.
Sponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.