Bitget Launches Pre-IPO SpaceX Token on Solana
1h ago|7 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Research
Expert Analysis
BitgetSpaceXSolanapre-IPO
Bitget and Republic announced on Apr 21, 2026 that an IPO Prime product will offer Solana-based tokens representing economic exposure to private companies, starting with a token tied to SpaceX, according to CoinDesk (Apr 21, 2026). The move formalizes a bridge between traditional private-placement demand and blockchain-native secondary trading: Republic, founded in 2016, will supply issuer structuring and compliance experience while Bitget, founded in 2018, will provide distribution and exchange infrastructure (source: CoinDesk; company filings). The token will be native to Solana, a network that launched mainnet Beta on March 16, 2020 and advertises throughput in excess of 50,000 transactions per second in lab conditions (source: Solana Labs). Regulators and market participants will read this launch as a test case: SpaceX is one of the highest profile private companies (last widely reported private valuation: $137 billion, PitchBook, Feb 2024) and the offering will be watched for secondary liquidity, investor protections, and cross-jurisdictional compliance.
Tokenization of private securities has accelerated across 2024–26, driven by two parallel trends: exchange-led product innovation and regulatory adjustments to crowdfunding regimes. Bitget's IPO Prime with Republic is a productized form of tokenized private exposure, engineered to give retail-access channels earlier seen only in accredited or institutional private placements. Republic is already active in regulated crowdfunding and private placement markets; Regulation Crowdfunding (Reg CF) rules were amended in 2021 to permit raises up to $5 million per offering (SEC rule changes effective 2021), creating a larger legal envelope for retail-targeted private deals (source: SEC). The Bitget approach differs from pure Reg CF in that the economic exposure is represented by a blockchain token that can, in principle, be traded on secondary venues.
The choice of Solana is operationally significant. Solana's on-chain latency and fee profile make it a more natural fit for tokenized securities that anticipate frequent secondary trading, compared with L1s where gas and congestion can impede trading. For context, Solana documents claim theoretical throughput above 50,000 transactions per second and sub-second finality under ideal conditions (Solana Labs); Ethereum's base-layer TPS remains in the low double-digits absent additional Layer-2 scaling (Ethereum Foundation). Those differences inform cost and market microstructure decisions for secondary marketplaces.
Finally, the issuer selection—SpaceX as the inaugural name—is a signal. SpaceX remains among the most liquid and sought-after private assets by wealth managers and retail platforms; trading in any form raises immediate questions about valuation transparency, transfer restrictions in existing cap tables, and the legal enforceability of token-represented rights. CoinDesk's Apr 21, 2026 report frames the launch as "opening access to retail investors" and notes the structuring partner is Republic (CoinDesk, Apr 21, 2026).
Key datapoints anchor the commercial and regulatory stakes for this initiative. First, the June 2021 SEC adjustment to Reg CF raised the maximum offering threshold to $5 million, which materially changed the economics of regulated retail raises and remains the regulatory backstop most relevant to Republic's prior activities (SEC release, 2021). Second, Solana's mainnet Beta went live on March 16, 2020 and the protocol documentation cites throughput metrics above 50,000 TPS in testing environments (Solana Labs). Third, CoinDesk's report on Apr 21, 2026 provides the transaction-level detail that Bitget will route the token listing via its exchange rails and Republic will handle dealbook access and compliance disclosures (CoinDesk, Apr 21, 2026).
Comparative metrics: tokenized pre-IPO access versus historical private placements. Traditional private pre-IPO allocations have historically been concentrated: major institutional investors, venture funds, and lead investors often capture the bulk of deal flow, leaving retail effectively sidelined. By contrast, tokenization campaigns can distribute fractional economic interests to a much larger pool—potentially hundreds of thousands of small positions—if issuer governance permits. That presents both scale and microstructure differences: more participants can mean thinner per-holder positions and potential for higher turnover. In a hypothetical comparison, a $1 billion private round tokenized into 100 million tokens yields average notional per token-holder far below the minimums typical in conventional private rounds.
Finally, from a market-cap perspective, SpaceX has been reported at $137 billion in private valuation as of Feb 2024 (PitchBook). While valuations evolve, using a headline private valuation shows the magnitude of economic exposure being tokenized; even fractional exposure to an asset of that scale can generate significant investor demand and price discovery activity in secondary markets.
Exchanges: If Bitget's experiment proves operationally and legally viable, expect other centralized exchanges and liquidity venues to accelerate issuer partnerships. The product puts exchanges in competition not only for spot liquidity and derivatives volume but for distribution of primary issuance—an area previously dominated by banks and private markets platforms. For incumbent intermediaries, this raises questions about custody, KYC/AML, and the arbitration of rights between on-chain token holders and off-chain cap tables.
Issuers and venture ecosystems: Tokenization creates a new optionality for founders and private companies. For companies that want broader retail engagement or synthetic secondary liquidity, a tokenized offering can monetize otherwise illiquid equity. The flip side is governance complexity: tokenized instruments need clear contract language on voting, transferability, and cap-table interaction. VCs and lead investors will weigh dilution and contractual friction: many existing shareholders have transfer restrictions that could impede or condition tokenized programs.
Market structure and benchmarks: The arrival of tokenized private assets on a high-throughput chain like Solana could create on-chain price discovery for assets that historically priced through bilateral negotiations. That could yield richer data for analysts and new benchmarks for private-market valuations, but also increased short-term volatility and gaming risk if tokens trade with low initial liquidity. Expect market-making strategies to emerge rapidly; automated market makers (AMMs) and centralized order books will experiment with hybrid models to manage spread and inventory risks.
Legal and regulatory risk is the primary near-term constraint. The SEC's past enforcement actions concerning tokenized offerings and secondary trading of crypto assets establish a precedent of intense scrutiny; issuers and platforms operating across U.S. and international jurisdictions must navigate differing securities laws, custody rules, and disclosure expectations. The DAO Report (SEC, 2017) and subsequent enforcement cases have repeatedly underscored that token design and economic realities, not just labels, determine securities classification.
Operational risk centers on reconciliation between on-chain tokens and issuer cap tables. If token holders claim economic rights that conflict with contractual provisions held by accredited investors, litigation risk escalates. Custody, transfer restrictions, and the ability to enforce buybacks or lockups will require robust legal engineering. Additionally, Solana's historical network outages (noted in 2020–2022) are part of the operational record that institutional counterparties will weigh; while throughput is high in ideal conditions, real-world resilience and finality under stress must be stress-tested.
Market risk includes liquidity and price discovery. A token linked to a private company with limited public comparable transactions can become subject to wide bid-ask spreads and fleeting liquidity. Retail-heavy participation can amplify short-term volatility compared with traditional private markets where sell-side syndicates and institutional buyers provide price support. Market-manipulation vectors are also a concern for regulators and custodians.
In the near term—12 to 18 months—Bitget's launch will act as an experiment that other exchanges and platforms will watch closely. If the Republic-structured SpaceX token clears regulatory and operational hurdles without triggering enforcement actions, expect incremental adoption by other private issuers seeking retail distribution channels. Conversely, any material regulatory pushback or cap-table litigation would slow replication and push products back into strictly regulated frameworks.
Longer-term, tokenization could become a standard adjunct to private markets, complementing existing liquidity solutions like tender offers and dedicated secondary platforms. That outcome depends on three variables: regulatory clarity (particularly in the U.S. and EU), robust legal mapping between token contracts and shareholder agreements, and market infrastructure for custody and settlement that meets institutional standards. Tradeoffs remain: greater retail access increases distribution but may reduce centralized control over secondary price formation.
Fazen Markets Perspective
Our non-consensus view: tokenized pre-IPO instruments will bifurcate into two distinct market segments within 24 months—regulated, institutionally supported tokenizations that integrate cleanly into issuer cap tables, and experimental, exchange-native tokens that prioritize tradability over legal symmetry. Bitget's Republic partnership signals an attempt to stay on the "regulated" side, but market incentives on exchanges often push toward tradability. Investors and issuers should therefore anticipate a co-existence of high-integrity, slow-adoption products and low-friction, fast-adoption products that carry higher legal risk.
We also expect fee arbitrage and intermediation spreads to compress rapidly. Solana's low-fee environment is likely to attract high-frequency market-makers who will compete on narrow spreads; however, any multi-hour outage or smart-contract exploit could reset market-making models and increase implied liquidity premia. Finally, valuation discovery on on-chain secondary markets will produce valuable signals but will require disciplined cross-checking against cap-table events, fundraising rounds, and company disclosures to avoid mistaking short-term price moves for fundamental value changes.
Q: Will on-chain token holders have the same shareholder rights as off-chain shareholders?
A: Not necessarily. Token design governs economic and voting rights; however, many incumbents retain contractual controls in cap tables that can restrict token-holder claims. Successful tokenizations align token rights with issuer legal documents and often involve escrow arrangements or side agreements managed by the structuring partner (e.g., Republic). Investors should examine the offering documents for explicit statements on voting, dividends, and transferability.
Q: How might this affect the price discovery of private companies broadly?
A: Tokenized secondary trading can increase observable price signals for private companies by creating more frequent transactions. That can reduce information asymmetry over time but may increase short-term volatility. Comparatively, private-company trade volumes were historically sparse; tokenization can move private-market price discovery closer to public-market dynamics, changing how analysts and LPs mark assets on portfolios.
Bitget's launch of a SpaceX-linked pre-IPO token on Solana, in partnership with Republic and announced Apr 21, 2026 (CoinDesk), is a pivotal test of whether exchange-distributed tokenization can scale within existing regulatory frameworks. The initiative sharpens the tradeoffs between broader retail access and the legal, operational, and market-structure risks that accompany tokenized private exposure.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
Trade the assets mentioned in this article
Trade on BybitSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.