White House Sends 14-Point US-Iran Pact to Congress for Review
1h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
us-iran-relationsgeopolitical-risk
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
The White House formally transmitted a confidential 14-point diplomatic framework agreement with Iran to Congress for review on 18 June 2026. The submission triggers a mandatory 30-day congressional oversight period, a procedural step required under US law for significant international accords. This action represents the most substantial public movement toward US-Iran diplomatic normalization in over a decade, directly impacting energy market volatility and defense sector valuations.
The current diplomatic initiative follows a period of sustained regional tensions, including incidents in the Strait of Hormuz in late 2025 that briefly pushed Brent crude prices above $95 per barrel. The global macroeconomic backdrop features the Federal Funds Target Rate at 4.50-4.75% and the US 10-year Treasury yield at 4.31%. The catalyst for this submission appears to be a confluence of factors, including European and Chinese diplomatic pressure for de-escalation and strategic US interests in stabilizing global energy supplies ahead of the winter 2026 heating season. The last major US-Iran agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), was finalized in 2015 before the US withdrawal in 2018.
Escalating indirect negotiations through Omani intermediaries throughout Q1 2026 paved the way for this framework. The 30-day review clock starts upon delivery to the House and Senate foreign relations committees. Market participants are assessing the likelihood of congressional approval or potential resolutions of disapproval, which would require a presidential veto to override. The Biden administration is leveraging executive authority to pursue a non-binding political understanding rather than a treaty, which would require a two-thirds Senate majority for ratification.
The 14-point document initiates a review process spanning a minimum of 30 calendar days. Global benchmark Brent crude oil futures fell 3.2% to $82.50 per barrel on the day of the announcement, while West Texas Intermediate (WTI) dropped 3.5% to $78.10. The price drop erased approximately $30 billion in market capitalization from the XLE Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund, which closed down 2.8%. The defense sector reacted inversely, with the ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF declining 1.5%.
A comparison of key market moves illustrates the immediate impact:
| Asset | Pre-Announcement (17 June Close) | Post-Announcement (18 June Close) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brent Crude | $85.22 | $82.50 | -3.2% |
| XLE ETF | $95.10 | $92.44 | -2.8% |
| ITA ETF | $124.50 | $122.63 | -1.5% |
The S&P 500 Index remained relatively flat, gaining 0.2%, indicating a sector-specific reaction rather than a broad market move. The volatility index, VIX, dropped 5% to 12.5, signaling a reduction in near-term market fear premiums linked to Middle East instability.
The most direct market impact is on energy equities and crude oil prices. A successful pact would likely maintain a persistent risk premium discount on oil, pressuring revenues for exploration and production companies like Exxon Mobil (XOM) and Chevron (CVX). Goldman Sachs analysts estimate a durable agreement could remove a $5-$8 per barrel geopolitical risk premium from oil prices. Defense contractors, including Lockheed Martin (LMT) and Raytheon (RTX), face potential headwinds from reduced escalation risks, which could dampen expectations for increased military procurement budgets.
A counter-argument suggests the market reaction may be premature, as congressional opposition could derail the process or dilute the framework's substance. Historical precedent shows that congressional review of the JCPOA in 2015 involved significant political friction. Institutional flow data from the first trading session after the announcement showed net selling in energy sector ETFs totaling over $500 million, while defense ETFs saw outflows of approximately $150 million. Hedge fund positioning data indicates a rapid covering of long oil futures positions and new short interest building in mid-cap defense names.
The primary catalyst is the conclusion of the 30-day congressional review period around 18 July 2026. Market participants will monitor statements from key committee chairs and ranking members for signals of bipartisan support or opposition. The next OPEC+ meeting on 3 July 2026 will be critical, as members may discuss production adjustments in response to the altered geopolitical landscape.
Traders are watching technical support levels for WTI crude at $77.50, a breach of which could target the 200-day moving average near $75. For the ITA defense ETF, a break below the $120 support level would indicate a more profound reassessment of sector growth prospects. The release of Q2 2026 earnings for major defense firms in late July will provide the first concrete evidence of any order book revisions linked to de-escalation expectations.
The review period is a requirement under the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015. It mandates that Congress has 30 days to review any pact related to Iran's nuclear program. During this time, Congress can pass a resolution of disapproval, though such a resolution can be vetoed by the President. This process does not constitute a treaty ratification, which is a separate and more arduous constitutional requirement.
The 14-point framework is reported to be broader than the JCPOA, which focused predominantly on limiting Iran's nuclear enrichment capabilities. The new agreement allegedly includes points addressing regional security, such as constraints on Iran's ballistic missile program and the activities of its proxy militias. Unlike the JCPOA, which was a formal agreement, this framework may be structured as a non-binding political understanding, giving the executive branch more flexibility but potentially less durability across administrations.
A central component of any agreement would involve the phased lifting of US sanctions on Iranian oil exports. Iran currently produces approximately 3.2 million barrels per day (bpd). A sanctions relief deal could allow Iran to increase exports by 500,000 to 1 million bpd within six months, adding significant supply to global markets. This potential supply surge is a key factor behind the sell-off in oil futures following the pact's submission to Congress.
Congressional reception over the next 30 days will determine the pact's viability and its sustained impact on energy and defense markets.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Navigate market volatility with professional tools
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.