US Proposes Tariffs on 60 Nations Over Forced Labor Enforcement
1h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
tariffsforced-labortrade-warsupply-chainsimports
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
The Trump administration announced on June 6, 2026, a proposal to impose new tariffs targeting 60 nations responsible for nearly all US imports. The action accuses these trading partners of failing to adequately enforce bans on foreign goods produced with forced labor. This represents the most expansive use of trade policy for human rights enforcement since the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act of 2021. The policy could significantly disrupt global supply chains and increase import costs for American consumers and businesses.
This tariff initiative expands upon the mechanism established by the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. That legislation created a rebuttable presumption that all goods from China's Xinjiang region were made with forced labor, effectively banning them unless proven otherwise. The new policy dramatically broadens the geographic scope beyond a single region to encompass most US trading partners. The administration is leveraging Section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which prohibits importing goods made with forced labor.
The proposal emerges amid ongoing global supply chain reconfiguration efforts following pandemic-era disruptions and rising geopolitical tensions. Many US companies have been pursuing "friend-shoring" strategies to reduce dependence on certain manufacturing regions. Treasury yields were stable ahead of the announcement, with the 10-year note trading at 4.31%. The administration framed the move as aligning trade policy with human rights objectives while addressing perceived imbalances in global trade relationships.
The proposed tariffs would affect imports from 60 countries that collectively account for approximately 98% of all US goods imports. Total US goods imports reached $3.2 trillion in 2025. The specific tariff rates have not been disclosed but would vary by country and sector based on perceived enforcement failures.
A preliminary analysis suggests the consumer staples sector faces particular exposure, with an estimated 35-40% of apparel and textile imports potentially subject to new duties. The electronics sector shows lower but still significant exposure at 15-20% of imports. These figures compare to the average US tariff rate of approximately 2.0% applied to most favored nation trading partners before recent trade actions.
| Metric | Pre-2026 Trade Environment | Potential Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Countries Affected | 1 (China-specific focus) | 60 (near-universal) |
| Avg. Tariff Rate | 2.0% | TBD (sector-specific) |
| Import Value at Risk | $150 billion (Xinjiang-focused) | $600-800 billion (estimated) |
The proposed tariffs would disproportionately affect retailers and import-dependent manufacturers. Companies like Walmart (WMT), Target (TGT), and Dollar General (DG) face potential margin compression as they either absorb higher costs or pass them to consumers already sensitive to inflation. Apparel manufacturers with complex global supply chains, including Nike (NKE) and VF Corporation (VFC), would need to accelerate supplier vetting processes and potentially relocate production.
Conversely, domestic manufacturers and nearshoring beneficiaries could gain competitive advantages. US textile producers and agricultural sectors might see increased domestic demand as import alternatives become more expensive. The policy could accelerate investment in manufacturing automation as companies seek to reduce labor cost disparities with offshore production. Logistics and supply chain verification technology providers would likely experience increased demand for their services.
Some trade experts question whether the blanket approach targeting 60 nations can be effectively implemented without overwhelming customs enforcement capabilities. The initiative may face legal challenges regarding its statutory authority and consistency with World Trade Organization obligations. Hedge funds have been increasing short positions in retail ETFs while going long on domestic industrial and technology stocks focused on supply chain management solutions.
Market participants should monitor the Office of the US Trade Representative's publication of specific tariff rates and implementation timelines, expected within 60 days. The response from targeted trading partners will be critical, particularly whether any announce retaliatory measures against US exports. Key congressional committees have scheduled hearings on the proposal for late July 2026.
Important levels to watch include the Bloomberg Agriculture Spot Index, currently at 145.2, for signs of increased domestic demand. The USD Index (DXY) at 104.5 may strengthen further if tariffs reduce the trade deficit. Import price index data releases on July 15 and August 14 will provide early indicators of passthrough inflation effects. The policy's ultimate impact will depend on enforcement rigor and whether exceptions are granted for compliant exporters.
The tariffs would likely increase prices for imported consumer goods, particularly in categories like apparel, footwear, and electronics. Economists estimate potential price increases of 3-7% on affected goods depending on the final tariff rates. The effect would be most pronounced on value-oriented retailers who rely heavily on global supply chains. The timing coincides with already elevated inflation readings, with core CPI at 3.4% year-over-year.
The administration is invoking Section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which prohibits importing goods mined, produced, or manufactured with forced labor. This provision has existed for decades but has been applied selectively rather than systematically. The legal novelty lies in applying it broadly across multiple trading partners simultaneously based on perceived enforcement failures rather than specific facility violations.
While the administration has not released the specific list, analysis suggests major manufacturing exporters including China, Vietnam, India, Mexico, and Bangladesh face significant exposure. The assessment appears based on import volume combined with State Department human rights reports. European Union members are likely included but may receive lower tariff rates due to stronger labor enforcement regimes.
The proposed tariffs represent the most expansive use of trade policy for human rights enforcement in US history.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Navigate market volatility with professional tools
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.