Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. AiX is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
The UK’s All-Party Parliamentary Group for Crypto and Digital Assets announced an inquiry on 21 July 2026 to investigate ongoing banking difficulties faced by domestic digital asset firms. This action follows the late June publication of the UK’s comprehensive crypto asset regulatory framework, which is scheduled for full implementation by October 2027. The probe will gather evidence from industry participants to understand the disconnect between established future regulations and current restrictive banking practices, aiming to identify specific friction points for legitimate businesses seeking access to payment rails and treasury management services.
The inquiry’s timing is a direct response to the finalization of the UK’s crypto regulatory regime. The government published the definitive framework for crypto asset activities on 24 June 2026, providing a three-year runway for firms to achieve compliance ahead of the October 2027 deadline. This legislation explicitly brings crypto activities under the purview of the Financial Conduct Authority, offering legal clarity that was absent during previous banking standoffs.
Historically, UK crypto firms have faced significant banking challenges. In February 2023, major high street banks like HSBC and NatWest imposed strict limits on transfers to crypto exchanges, citing volatility and fraud risks. This created a prolonged period where legitimate businesses struggled with account closures and payment processing barriers, a situation the new framework was designed to resolve.
The current macro backdrop includes Bank of England interest rates holding at 5.25%, influencing risk appetite across financial services. The catalyst for the parliamentary action is the persistent reporting from the sector that banking access has not improved materially since the framework’s announcement, suggesting that traditional financial institutions remain cautious despite the regulatory certainty provided by Parliament.
Industry data underscores the scale of the challenge. A 2025 survey by UK Finance indicated that 40% of digital asset businesses reported having a primary banking relationship terminated within the previous 18 months. Only 35% of UK-based crypto firms surveyed claimed to have unrestricted access to business banking services, compared to over 90% of fintech companies in other sectors.
The discrepancy in treatment is evident in transaction limits. While traditional money service businesses typically face transaction limits exceeding 1 million GBP per day, many crypto firms report caps set below 100,000 GBP daily. This severely constrains operational scalability. The table below illustrates the contrast in key banking metrics between a typical crypto firm and a standard fintech in 2026.
| Banking Metric | Typical Crypto Firm | Typical Fintech Firm |
|---|---|---|
| Account Application Success Rate | ~30% | ~85% |
| Average Daily Transaction Cap | < £100,000 | > £1,000,000 |
| Treasury Management Access | Limited | Full |
Payment processor data shows crypto merchants in the UK pay average transaction fees of 2.5-3.5%, significantly higher than the 1.5-2.0% average for e-commerce businesses. This premium reflects the perceived risk and operational complexity banks associate with crypto-related payment flows.
The parliamentary probe introduces a potential catalyst for UK-listed entities with crypto exposure. Firms like IG Group (IGG.L) and Plus500 (PLUS.L), which offer crypto derivative products, could benefit from a normalized banking environment that simplifies client onboarding and cash management. Easier banking access would lower operational costs for exchange-traded products tracking Bitcoin and Ethereum, potentially increasing their appeal to a broader investor base.
A key risk to this optimistic view is that the inquiry may not compel immediate action from banks. Financial institutions operate under separate prudential regulations and may maintain their cautious stance until the FCA’s regime is fully operational in late 2027. The banks’ primary concern revolves around anti-money laundering compliance and the technical challenges of monitoring blockchain-based transactions, which are outside the scope of the current parliamentary inquiry.
Market positioning data from CFTC reports shows a slight increase in net long positions for Bitcoin futures among institutional managers, suggesting some anticipate a positive regulatory resolution. Flow has been gradually moving into crypto infrastructure stocks, with the Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) seeing net inflows of $18 million in the week preceding the announcement.
The inquiry will begin collecting written evidence throughout August 2026, with public evidence sessions scheduled for October. Market participants should monitor the witness list for these sessions; testimony from major banking executives versus crypto CEOs will reveal the depth of the disagreement.
Key regulatory milestones precede the 2027 deadline. The Financial Conduct Authority is expected to publish its final consultation paper on implementation rules by 31 March 2027. This document will provide the detailed compliance requirements that banks are likely waiting for before updating their internal policies.
The level of engagement from HM Treasury will be a critical signal. If Treasury officials participate actively in the inquiry, it indicates high-level government support for resolving the issue. A key threshold to watch is whether any interim guidance for banks is proposed before the end of 2026 to bridge the gap until full implementation.
The framework establishes a comprehensive licensing regime for crypto asset activities, including issuance, trading, and custody, under FCA supervision. It mandates strict capital requirements, consumer protection rules, and detailed anti-money laundering protocols. The regime aligns with the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations but includes UK-specific provisions for stablecoins intended for use as a means of payment. Firms must apply for authorization, and unauthorized activities will become illegal after October 2027.
The EU’s MiCA regulation, fully applicable since December 2025, includes explicit provisions granting licensed crypto asset service providers the right to access credit institution accounts. This ‘right to bank’ is a cornerstone of the EU framework, directly addressing the access issue. The UK’s current framework does not contain an equivalent mandatory access clause, which is a central point of contention the parliamentary inquiry is likely to examine.
AiX is our free MetaTrader 4 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. XAUUSD breakout engine.
Trade the assets mentioned in this article
Trade on BybitSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
