Trump Hosts Auto CEOs on Right-to-Repair, Aims at Biden Policy
1h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
right-to-repairautomotive
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Former President Donald Trump convened a private meeting with chief executives from major auto manufacturers on June 4, focusing on the escalating national policy debate over right-to-repair legislation. The meeting, first reported by Investing.com, was organized to align opposition against proposed federal regulations that would mandate expanded consumer and third-party access to vehicle diagnostic data and software. Industry executives argue such rules would compromise cybersecurity and intellectual property, while proponents claim they are necessary to break manufacturer-controlled repair monopolies. The discussion occurred against a backdrop of a pending National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) rulemaking process initiated by the Biden administration in late 2025.
The political fight over right-to-repair has intensified since Massachusetts voters passed a landmark ballot initiative in 2020, requiring carmakers to provide a standardized, open-access data platform. The Automotive Right to Repair Coalition spent over $45 million in that campaign. A subsequent federal court injunction in 2023 temporarily blocked enforcement, citing potential conflicts with federal vehicle safety standards.
The current macro backdrop features elevated interest rates, with the Federal Funds target at 4.75-5.00%, pressuring auto loan affordability. New vehicle inventory levels have normalized to a 60-day supply, down from pandemic peaks of over 100 days. This normalization has shifted manufacturer focus back to protecting high-margin service and parts revenue streams.
The immediate catalyst is the NHTSA's Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) issued November 2025. The rulemaking seeks to establish a federal standard for vehicle-generated data access, directly responding to the patchwork of state laws. The Trump meeting signals a coordinated industry strategy to influence this rulemaking ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, where control of Congress could shift regulatory agendas.
The financial stakes in the repair data debate are substantial. The U.S. light-duty vehicle repair and maintenance market is valued at approximately $80 billion annually. Manufacturer-authorized dealerships capture roughly 60% of this revenue, or $48 billion. Independent repair shops service the remaining 40%, or $32 billion, but face increasing barriers due to proprietary software.
A 2025 study by the Auto Care Association found the average vehicle now generates over 25 gigabytes of data per hour of driving. Access to this telematics data is central to modern diagnostics. The table below illustrates the revenue disparity between new car sales and the high-margin after-sales service business.
| Segment | Annual US Revenue | Average Gross Margin |
|---|---|---|
| New Vehicle Sales | ~$1.1 trillion | 8-12% |
| Parts & Service (Dealership) | ~$48 billion | 45-55% |
| Parts & Service (Independent) | ~$32 billion | 35-45% |
For comparison, the S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary sector is up 4.2% year-to-date, underperforming the broader index's 8.1% gain. Auto manufacturer stocks have been a drag, with the industry group down 1.8% over the same period amid regulatory uncertainty. Publicly traded auto dealership groups like AutoNation (AN) and Lithia Motors (LAD) derive over 50% of their gross profit from parts and service operations, highlighting their vulnerability to regulatory changes.
A regulatory shift favoring expanded right-to-repair would create distinct winners and losers across the automotive ecosystem. Major manufacturers like General Motors (GM), Ford (F), and Stellantis (STLA) stand to lose the most, as their lucrative parts-and-service revenue faces dilution. These segments often contribute 40-50% of total corporate profits despite representing a smaller portion of top-line sales. A 10% market share shift from dealerships to independents could translate to a $4-5 billion annual revenue headwind for the Detroit Three.
Conversely, the aftermarket parts and repair sector would be a direct beneficiary. Companies like Genuine Parts Company (GPC), owner of NAPA Auto Parts, and O'Reilly Automotive (ORLY) could see accelerated growth in their commercial business serving independent shops. Firms specializing in diagnostic tools and software, such as Snap-on (SNA) and Bosch's automotive aftermarket division, would also gain from a more open ecosystem.
A key limitation to the bullish aftermarket thesis is cybersecurity. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an industry group, cites a 300% increase in remote vehicle hacking attempts from 2022 to 2025. Mandating standardized data ports could introduce new attack vectors. The counter-argument from security researchers is that many current proprietary systems also have vulnerabilities, and open standards often lead to more strong, community-vetted security.
Positioning data shows hedge funds have been increasing short exposure to pure-play dealership chains like Group 1 Automotive (GPI) and Sonic Automotive (SAH) since the NHTPA's ANPRM announcement. Simultaneously, long-only institutional funds have been accumulating stakes in aftermarket retailers, viewing them as a defensive play with a potential regulatory catalyst.
The next major catalyst is the close of the NHTSA public comment period on July 31, 2026. The volume and substance of comments from industry, consumer groups, and cybersecurity experts will shape the draft rule. A second key date is the Federal Trade Commission's annual right-to-repair report to Congress, due by September 30, which is expected to take a firm stance in favor of expanded access.
Market participants should monitor the 50-day moving average for the S&P 500 Automobile Components Index (S15AUTM), which currently sits at 1,420. A sustained break above 1,500 would signal investor confidence in a favorable outcome for the aftermarket. For dealership stocks, the critical support level to watch is the November 2025 low, representing a 22% decline from recent highs.
The political landscape remains fluid. A Republican majority in either chamber of Congress after the November 2026 elections could lead to legislative efforts to preempt NHTSA's rulemaking. Conversely, a Democratic sweep could accelerate the rule's finalization, with a potential effective date as early as model year 2029.
Electric vehicle manufacturers like Tesla (TSLA) are even more vertically integrated, with a stronger reliance on proprietary software and direct-to-consumer service. Tesla's repair model is largely captive, with limited third-party access to its high-voltage systems and battery management software. For EV makers, the data at stake includes battery health analytics, charging patterns, and autonomous driving software logs. A pro-repair ruling could force a significant business model shift, potentially unlocking a competitive advantage for traditional manufacturers with established independent service networks. The valuation impact could be more pronounced for pure-play EV companies.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Navigate market volatility with professional tools
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.