TotalEnergies Oil Trading Earns $2 Billion Annually, CEO Says
1h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
totalenergiesoil-trading
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
TotalEnergies SE’s oil trading activities generate approximately $2 billion in annual profit, Chief Executive Officer Patrick Pouyanné stated on 29 May 2026. This rare public disclosure by a major oil company executive quantifies the significant contribution of proprietary trading desks to integrated energy firms. The announcement provides a concrete benchmark for a typically opaque segment of the global commodities market.
Public quantification of trading desk profitability by a major CEO is exceptionally rare. BP Plc’s former CEO Bob Dudley noted in 2015 that their trading division could add or subtract hundreds of millions of dollars quarterly, but avoided specific annual figures. Shell Plc’s trading operations have been estimated by analysts to generate between $2.5 billion to $3 billion annually, though the company has never confirmed these numbers.
The current macro backdrop features elevated volatility in crude markets. Brent crude futures have traded between $75 and $95 per barrel throughout 2026, creating numerous arbitrage opportunities. Geopolitical tensions in key producing regions and ongoing OPEC+ supply management have sustained price differentials across grades and locations.
Pouyanné’s disclosure appears strategically timed amid increasing regulatory scrutiny on commodity trading transparency. European legislators have proposed stricter reporting requirements for energy trading activities following the 2022 crisis. The statement serves to legitimize these operations as a core competency rather than a speculative activity.
TotalEnergies’ $2 billion annual trading profit represents approximately 10% of the company’s total adjusted net income of $20.2 billion for fiscal year 2025. The trading segment’s contribution exceeds the entire net income of many independent exploration and production companies. Marathon Oil reported $1.6 billion net income for 2025.
The profitability demonstrates remarkable consistency across market cycles. Pouyanné indicated this performance level is “generally” maintained annually, suggesting sophisticated risk management protocols. This consistency contrasts with pure trading firms like Vitol Group, which reported $15 billion profit in 2022 but just $4 billion in 2023.
TotalEnergies maintains trading operations across multiple crude benchmarks and refined products. The company’s physical presence across key hubs including Rotterdam, Singapore, and Houston provides logistical advantages. Their integrated model allows arbitrage across production, refining, and marketing segments that pure traders cannot access.
| Metric | TotalEnergies | Shell (Est.) | BP (Est.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual Trading Profit | $2B | $2.5-3B | $1.5-2B |
| % of Total Earnings | ~10% | ~8% | ~12% |
TotalEnergies’ disclosure validates the significant hidden value within integrated oil companies’ trading operations. Equity analysts may reassess valuation models for European majors including Shell, BP, and Equinor. These firms likely maintain similarly profitable desks, suggesting potential upside to consensus earnings estimates.
The transparency could pressure other majors to disclose trading profitability, creating more comparable metrics across the sector. This might lead to sector-wide multiple expansion as investors better appreciate this earnings stream’s durability. Refiners with trading operations like Valero Energy and Phillips 66 could also benefit from increased investor attention on this segment.
A counter-argument suggests that highlighting trading profits might attract regulatory attention precisely as lawmakers debate stricter rules. Some investors might perceive these profits as volatile despite management’s characterization of consistency. The disclosure could also create unrealistic expectations for quarterly trading performance.
Hedge funds have been increasing long positions in European energy majors throughout 2026. The sector trades at approximately 7.5 times earnings versus 11 times for the broader energy index. This disclosure provides fundamental support for those positioning decisions.
Investors should monitor TotalEnergies’ Q2 2026 earnings release on 31 July 2026 for any updated trading performance metrics. Management may provide additional color on how different commodity classes contribute to the $2 billion annual figure.
OPEC+ meetings on 6 June and 4 December 2026 will significantly impact trading opportunities. Production quota decisions create dislocation across time spreads and geographical differentials that trading desks exploit.
The European Union’s proposed Energy Trading Transparency Act enters final debate stages in September 2026. The legislation would mandate more detailed reporting of trading positions and profits. Passage could force similar disclosures from all major energy companies.
Brent crude term structure will be crucial for trading profitability. A sustained contango exceeding $0.50 per barrel per month indicates storage economics that benefit physical traders. Backwardation beyond $1.00 typically reduces opportunities.
Oil trading desks profit from price differentials across time, location, and quality. They might buy physical crude in West Africa for immediate delivery while simultaneously selling futures contracts for later delivery, capturing the time spread. They also arbitrage price differences between Brent and WTI benchmarks or between sweet and sour crude grades. Physical logistics like storage and transportation provide additional advantages.
The disclosure highlights a valuable and consistent earnings stream that may have been undervalued by the market. Analysts might increase their price targets on TotalEnergies shares as they incorporate this profitability into valuation models. The stock typically trades at a discount to US peers like ExxonMobil due to perceived higher volatility, but this disclosure could narrow that discount.
Integrated majors like TotalEnergies trade primarily to optimize their own production and refining assets, using proprietary capital. Independent traders like Vitol or Trafigura trade primarily for client execution and proprietary speculation using more leveraged structures. Majors have superior market information through their physical operations but may take less directional risk than independents.
TotalEnergies' quantified trading profit reveals a major hidden value driver for integrated oil companies.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Trade oil, gas & energy markets
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.