TotalEnergies Ships Oil Through Hormuz Despite Risk, Deep Discounts Persist
1h ago|5 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
strait-of-hormuzcrude-oil
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. AiX is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
TotalEnergies Chief Executive Patrick Pouyanne stated on August 25, 2026, that the French energy major is actively and profitably transporting crude oil through the Strait of Hormuz. The comments, delivered at a Norwegian energy conference, provide a rare ground-level confirmation that physical oil flows are adapting to the strait's significant geopolitical risk premium. Pouyanne revealed that producers are offering discounts as large as $30 per barrel against the Brent benchmark, which traded above $90, to incentivize shipments. This discount mechanism, while highlighting seller desperation, effectively offsets the dramatically increased war-risk transport costs, creating a functioning, albeit quieter, market for Gulf crude.
The Strait of Hormuz has been a focal point of global energy security for decades, historically facilitating the transit of approximately 20% of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas supplies. The current paralysis stems from heightened tensions in the US and Israeli conflict with Iran, which have introduced tangible threats of maritime attacks, including bombings and naval mines. This situation echoes past disruptions, such as the 2019 tanker attacks and the 1980s Tanker War during the Iran-Iraq conflict, though the current risk premium embedded in shipping costs is unprecedented in scale. The market has been operating under the assumption that the strait is effectively closed for business, with headline benchmarks like Brent pricing in a significant disruption risk. Pouyanne's account challenges this narrative by detailing the practical, cost-based workaround that has emerged, demonstrating how physical markets can adapt even when financial markets signal a blockade.
The economic viability of Hormuz transits hinges on a stark price disparity and substantial cost calculations. Pouyanne provided specific figures that quantify the current market anomaly. Producers, primarily from Iraq and Qatar, are selling crude at prices between $50 and $60 per barrel. This represents a discount of roughly $30 per barrel compared to the Brent benchmark, which was trading above $90 on the day of his comments. The cost of moving a very large crude carrier (VLCC) through the perilous strait and back is approximately $20 million per voyage. When spread across a standard VLCC cargo of about 2 million barrels, this adds a transport surcharge of around $10 per barrel. The economics for refined products, however, are entirely different. Smaller product tankers carry less volume, pushing the equivalent surcharge to an unsustainable $50 per barrel, effectively halting product flows through the strait. This creates a clear divergence: crude moves with a manageable $10 surcharge offset by a $30 discount, while products face a $50 surcharge with no comparable discount mechanism.
| Metric | Crude Oil | Refined Products |
|---|---|---|
| Producer Price | $50-$60/barrel | N/A (No flow) |
| Discount vs. Brent | ~$30/barrel | N/A |
| Hormuz Surcharge | ~$10/barrel | ~$50/barrel |
| Net Economic Viability | Profitable | Prohibitive |
The market dynamic described by Pouyanne has direct implications for energy sector valuations and trading strategies. For integrated supermajors like TotalEnergies (TTE) with strong trading divisions, the ability to profit from this arbitrage represents a significant competitive advantage, potentially boosting earnings in their trading segments. The deep discounts indicate severe pressure on national oil companies and producers in the region, whose revenues are directly impacted by the need to offer steep price cuts. The bull market for refined products, conversely, benefits global refiners with access to non-Gulf crude, as constrained product exports from the Middle East tighten global supply. This supports elevated crack spreads, the profit margin for refining crude into products, for companies with complex refineries in Europe, North America, and Asia. A key counter-argument is that this mechanism depends on a continued willingness of ship owners to accept the risk, which could vanish abruptly following a single major security incident. Trading flow data suggests hedge funds are increasingly taking long positions in gasoline and diesel futures while maintaining short or neutral positions on certain Middle Eastern crude grades, betting on the persistence of this split.
The stability of this quiet shipping corridor is fragile and dependent on several near-term catalysts. The primary factor is any escalation or de-escalation in geopolitical tensions, which lacks a fixed timetable but requires constant monitoring of diplomatic channels. More concretely, the market will watch for the projected completion of the UAE's project to double the capacity of the Habshan-Fujairah pipeline by 2027, which would provide a permanent alternative route for a portion of Gulf exports. The next OPEC+ meeting, while its date is not yet set for 2026, will be scrutinized for any commentary on production policies aimed at managing these regional dislocations. Traders should monitor the spread between Brent crude and Dubai/Oman benchmarks; a widening beyond the current $30 discount could signal increasing producer distress or mounting shipping risks. A closure of the arbitrage window would be signaled by a narrowing of this discount or a sharp spike in VLCC charter rates for Hormuz transits.
The 2019 incidents involved targeted attacks on individual vessels, causing a temporary spike in insurance premiums and regional tensions. The current environment is fundamentally different, characterized by a sustained, high-level threat of broader conflict that has led to a semi-permanent rerouting of official shipping schedules. The scale of the risk premium, reflected in the $20 million round-trip cost for a VLCC, is substantially higher and has persisted for a longer duration, forcing a more structural market adaptation through deep price discounts rather than just a temporary disruption.
The deep discount acts as a pressure release valve for global crude markets. It indicates that a significant volume of oil is still reaching the market, which helps cap the upside potential for benchmark crudes like Brent. Even amid sanctions and shipping risks, the availability of heavily discounted barrels from the Gulf prevents a supply shock that would otherwise send prices soaring. This creates a divergence where headline prices reflect risk, but physical supply remains available at a lower cost for those willing to manage the complexities.
TotalEnergies' continued investment in alternative routes, such as the pipeline from Baghdad to Syria and the expansion of the Fujairah pipeline, signals a long-term strategic view. The company's leadership appears to believe that the geopolitical risk associated with the Strait of Hormuz is a multi-year or even decade-long feature of the market, not a temporary problem. While current shipping is profitable, it remains vulnerable to sudden closure. Pipelines represent a more secure and cost-effective long-term solution, reducing reliance on volatile shipping lanes and securing supply chains for the future.
Physical crude oil continues to flow through the Strait of Hormuz, but only via a mechanism of deep producer discounts that masks significant market stress.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
AiX is our free MetaTrader 4 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. XAUUSD breakout engine.
Trade oil, gas & energy markets
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.