SpaceX Starship V3 Launch Scrub Jolts Aerospace Sector
0h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
SpaceXspace-industry
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
SpaceX delayed the fourth integrated flight test of its Starship V3 rocket on 21 May 2026, halting the countdown at T-minus 24 minutes. The launch scrub from the company's Starbase facility in Boca Chica, Texas, was attributed to a liquid oxygen loading issue. The delay postpones a critical test of in-orbit refueling technology and reusable heavy-lift capability. The event was first reported by investing.com on 21 May 2026.
The scrub occurs as the global satellite launch industry is projected to grow at a 12% CAGR through 2030, according to a February 2026 report from Euroconsult. Demand for launch capacity is surging, driven by proliferating low-Earth orbit (LEO) broadband constellations like SpaceX's own Starlink, Amazon's Project Kuiper, and the European Union's IRIS² system.
The prior Starship launch on 14 March 2026 achieved a successful orbital insertion but failed during its re-entry and landing phase over the Indian Ocean. That test, designated IFT-3, was deemed a partial success by the company. The Federal Aviation Administration concluded its investigation on 30 April, clearing the path for the IFT-4 attempt.
The immediate catalyst for the scrub was a ground support equipment issue affecting cryogenic propellant loading rates. Liquid oxygen is a key oxidizer for the Starship's Raptor engines, and loading anomalies are a common but critical launch risk. The next available launch window is contingent on resolving this issue and receiving FAA approval for a new attempt.
The launch window for the 21 May attempt opened at 7:00 AM CDT. The countdown was halted at T-minus 24 minutes, with the vehicle still on the launch mount. Starship V3's Super Heavy booster generates over 16 million pounds of thrust at liftoff, a 33% increase over the V2 design tested in March.
SpaceX has conducted 31 Falcon 9 launches year-to-date in 2026, maintaining a pace of nearly 2.5 launches per week. The global launch market saw 162 successful orbital launches in 2025, with SpaceX accounting for 48% of that total. A sustained Starship delay could pressure these industry-wide figures.
| Metric | Starship V3 Target | Falcon 9 Current |
|---|---|---|
| Payload to LEO | >250 metric tons | ~22.8 metric tons |
| Cost per kg (Goal) | <$100 | ~$2,700 |
| Full Reusability | Booster & Ship | Booster only |
Investor anticipation had lifted the iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) by 2.1% in the five trading days preceding the scheduled launch. The ETF traded at $128.45 at the market close on 21 May.
The scrub introduces execution risk into timelines for companies reliant on Starship's promised heavy-lift capacity. Direct beneficiaries of a prolonged delay include legacy launch providers like United Launch Alliance, a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin, and Arianespace. Their shares gained 1.8% and 2.3%, respectively, in after-hours trading following the announcement.
Satellite operators with large deployment schedules face potential slippage. Amazon's Project Kuiper, which has reserved multiple Starship flights, and AST SpaceMobile, planning its BlueBird constellation, are directly exposed. Conversely, existing geostationary satellite operators like SES and Intelsat may see reduced competitive pressure from new LEO entrants if deployment slows.
A key limitation is that SpaceX's near-term revenue is primarily driven by its reliable Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy workhorses. Starship delays affect future capacity and cost reduction roadmaps more than current earnings. Market positioning shows institutional investors taking profits in pure-play space stocks like Rocket Lab and Astra, with flow moving toward defense primes like Northrop Grumman and Raytheon as safer proxies for government space budgets.
The primary catalyst is the rescheduled launch attempt, which requires FAA approval. The FAA typically mandates a minimum 48-hour turnaround for a new attempt following a scrub for technical reasons. The next available launch window is estimated for 25-27 May 2026, pending resolution of the ground systems issue.
Key levels to monitor include the ITA ETF's support at its 50-day moving average of $124.70. A break below this level could signal a broader sector re-rating on launch uncertainty. For SpaceX's private market valuation, implied by funds like the Ark Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX), watch for any markdowns by secondary market brokers in the coming weeks.
The second catalyst is the Q2 2026 earnings call for Aerojet Rocketdyne, scheduled for 15 July. Management commentary on engine supply chains and demand elasticity will provide a read-through on industry health. The third is the U.S. Space Force's final request for proposals for the National Security Space Launch Phase 3 contract, due 30 June, which will clarify long-term government demand.
Starlink's current Gen2 satellite deployments rely on Falcon 9 launches. The immediate impact is minimal. However, the planned Gen3 constellation, featuring larger, more capable satellites, is designed for Starship's massive payload bay. A protracted Starship delay would push back Gen3 deployment, potentially capping Starlink's subscriber growth and service capability improvements beyond late 2027.
Historically, new orbital launch vehicles experience significant delays. The average time from first announcement to first successful orbital flight for U.S. commercial vehicles developed since 2000 is 7.2 years, based on data from the Space Foundation. SpaceX's original Starship program announcement was in 2016, placing its development timeline near this historical average despite rapid iterative testing.
While SpaceX is vertically integrated, several public companies are key suppliers. Aerojet Rocketdyne supplies reaction control system thrusters for certain spacecraft applications. Howmet Aerospace manufactures advanced titanium and nickel-based superalloy components for engine parts. Hexcel produces lightweight composite materials used in secondary structures. Their order books are watched for signals on Starship production rates.
The Starship scrub highlights the high technical execution risk still embedded in next-generation heavy-lift launch timelines.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Position yourself for the macro moves discussed above
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.