Musk Pursues Space Reusability 'Holy Grail' for SpaceX Profitability
2h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
spacexelon-musk
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Elon Musk is actively targeting the 'holy grail of space flight' by achieving full reusability for SpaceX's Starship launch system, according to a report from Bloomberg on June 12, 2026. This engineering milestone remains the primary focus of SpaceX leadership despite the company's soaring valuation and Musk's personal wealth derived from other ventures. Full reuse aims to transform the economics of orbital access, potentially reducing per-kilogram launch costs toward Musk's stated long-term goal of $10. The pursuit underscores a strategic commitment to long-term infrastructure over short-term revenue maximization.
SpaceX has already demonstrated the viability of partial reuse with its Falcon 9 rocket, which has flown first-stage boosters up to twenty times. This operational reuse has allowed SpaceX to capture over 60% of the global commercial launch market. The current focus on Starship's full reusability is the logical next step in a multi-year strategy to commoditize space access.
Full reusability of both the Super Heavy booster and the Starship upper stage is the catalyst needed for missions to Mars and the development of large-scale orbital infrastructure. The macro backdrop of rising private capital investment in space ventures, projected to exceed $1 trillion by 2040, hinges on achieving these lower launch costs. The technological shift from expendable to reusable rockets parallels the transition from single-use rockets to reusable aircraft in early aviation.
The financial mechanics of reusability define the modern space race. A single expendable launch of SpaceX's Falcon Heavy can cost a customer over $150 million. A Falcon 9 launch with a reused first stage costs approximately $67 million, representing a 55% price reduction for customers.
Developing the fully reusable Starship system has required capital expenditure exceeding $10 billion. Success would collapse the cost per kilogram to orbit. Where the Space Shuttle cost about $54,500 per kilogram, Starship's target is below $100. The table below illustrates the dramatic shift.
| Launch System | Cost per kg to LEO | Reusability |
|---|---|---|
| Space Shuttle (historical) | ~$54,500 | Partial (Orbiter only) |
| Falcon 9 (expendable) | ~$2,700 | None |
| Falcon 9 (reused) | ~$1,500 | First Stage Only |
| Starship (target) | <$100 | Full (Booster & Ship) |
This cost trajectory starkly contrasts with traditional aerospace contractors, where development cycles often span 15 years with budgets over $20 billion for expendable systems like NASA's SLS.
Achieving full reusability would create asymmetric second-order effects across multiple sectors. Direct beneficiaries include satellite broadband constellations like Starlink, which could see its deployment and refresh costs plummet, and in-space manufacturing companies requiring frequent, low-cost cargo delivery. Publicly-listed companies in the satellite communications and Earth observation space, such as AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) and Planet Labs (PL), stand to gain from cheaper deployment of their hardware.
The aerospace and defense sector faces significant disruption. Traditional contractors like Lockheed Martin (LMT) and Boeing (BA), whose business models are built on government cost-plus contracts for limited-run, high-margin hardware, risk losing market share to SpaceX's commercial, volume-driven approach. A key counter-argument is that national security launch requirements may continue to favor a diverse supplier base, insulating some legacy players.
Positioning is already evident in venture capital flows, with over $17.6 billion invested in space infrastructure startups in 2025. Institutional investors are increasingly long on downstream applications—orbital logistics, space stations, and resource utilization—while remaining cautious on pure-play launch providers outside of SpaceX.
The immediate catalyst for market assessment is Starship's next integrated flight test, which could occur as early as Q3 2026. A successful demonstration of in-orbit refueling would be a critical sub-step toward Mars missions. Regulatory milestones from the FAA regarding launch frequency and site expansions at Boca Chica and Kennedy Space Center will dictate operational tempo.
Investors should monitor the pricing of SpaceX's upcoming dedicated satellite rideshare missions. Sustained price reductions for these services will be the clearest market signal of reusability gains flowing through. Key levels to watch are the implied valuation of SpaceX in secondary markets, currently estimated above $200 billion, and the stock performance of publicly-traded space ETFs like ARKX.
Retail investors cannot directly invest in SpaceX as it remains privately held. The impact is felt indirectly through publicly-traded companies in the space ecosystem. Cheaper launch costs act as a rising tide for satellite operators, data analytics firms, and component suppliers. ETFs like Procure Space (UFO) and the SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) provide diversified exposure to this theme, though they carry high volatility and sector-specific risk.
The Falcon 9 program proved the economic case for first-stage reusability, reducing costs by over 50%. Starship's goal is total reusability, where both stages return for rapid re-flight, akin to a commercial airliner. The engineering challenge is vastly greater, involving orbital re-entry of a much larger vehicle. Success would not be incremental but transformative, moving the industry from cost reduction to true commoditization of Earth-to-orbit transport.
Launch costs have followed a declining but uneven trajectory since the dawn of the space age. The Apollo-era Saturn V cost over $1.5 billion per launch in today's dollars. The Space Shuttle aimed for reusability but failed to lower costs due to extensive refurbishment. SpaceX's innovation is applying airline-style operational efficiency to rocketry. Reaching $100/kg would represent a 99.8% cost reduction from the Shuttle era, unlocking business models that are currently science fiction.
SpaceX's pursuit of full rocket reusability is a capital-intensive bet to dismantle the primary cost barrier to a spacefaring economy.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Position yourself for the macro moves discussed above
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.