Shipowners Cautious as 600 Vessels Delay Hormuz Transit After Deal
2h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
strait-of-hormuzoil-shipping
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
A provisional deal that could reopen the Strait of Hormuz within days is being met with extreme caution by commercial shipping interests, according to a June 15, 2026 report from Bloomberg. Over 600 merchant vessels are reportedly waiting for clarity before attempting transit, following months of disruptions and false starts in the vital waterway. The strait is a chokepoint for 21 million barrels of oil daily, representing about 21% of global seaborne crude volumes. Market reaction hinges on whether this agreement translates into verifiably safe passage for large commercial vessels, including Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCCs).
The Strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical oil transit chokepoint. The last major prolonged closure occurred in 2019, when tanker attacks and seizures led to a short-term insurance premium spike of over 300% and a 9% jump in Brent crude prices over two weeks. The current disruption has persisted for months, forcing a rerouting of crude flows around the Arabian Peninsula via longer and more expensive routes. The global macro backdrop includes Brent crude trading near $82 per barrel and the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) at elevated levels, reflecting persistent supply chain tensions. The catalyst for the current diplomatic push is the commercial pressure from sustained high shipping costs and the accumulation of over 600 vessels in waiting zones, creating a logistical bottleneck that threatens global inventory draws.
Concrete data illustrates the scale of the disruption. The rerouting of tankers from the Persian Gulf adds approximately 15 days to a round-trip voyage to European refiners, increasing voyage costs by an estimated $800,000 per VLCC. The Baltic Exchange's dirty tanker rate benchmark for the Middle East Gulf to China route (TD3C) is currently assessed at Worldscale 180, nearly double its 5-year average for June. Insurance war risk premiums for vessels entering the Persian Gulf region remain above 0.5% of hull value, compared to a standard rate of 0.025% in secure zones. Tanker tracking data shows a 40% week-on-week decline in crude volumes transiting the strait in early June. For comparison, the S&P GSCI Commodity Index energy sector is up 12% year-to-date, while the S&P 500 is up 8%.
| Metric | Pre-Disruption Level | Current Level | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| VLCC Suezmax Rates (AG-West) | Worldscale 95 | Worldscale 180 | +89% |
| War Risk Premium (% of hull) | 0.025% | 0.55% | +2,100% |
| Estimated Waiting Vessels | 50-100 | 600+ | +500% |
The immediate beneficiaries of continued caution are owners of vessels on alternative routes. Companies with significant exposure to the VLCC and Suezmax segments operating outside the Persian Gulf, such as Euronav (EURN) and Frontline (FRO), have seen rates for their Atlantic Basin fleets remain elevated. The oil market faces a bifurcated impact. A swift reopening could trigger a near-term sell-off in crude as logistical fears abate. However, the physical drawdown of inventories caused by the shipping delay means any price drop may be shallow and temporary. The clearest loser is the marine insurance sector, which faces accumulating claims and cannot easily reprice risk after a sudden reopening. A key risk is that the deal fails to address underlying security guarantees, leading to a rapid reversal and another price spike. Positioning data shows commodity trading advisors (CTAs) maintaining a net-long stance on crude futures, while hedge funds have increased short positions in tanker stocks ahead of a potential normalization.
The next concrete catalyst is the official announcement of the deal's terms, expected by June 20. Market participants will scrutinize the language on naval escorts and mine-clearing operations. Following that, the weekly U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) petroleum status report on June 22 will provide the first data on whether the shipping backlog is clearing. Key levels to watch include Brent crude support at $78.50, a breach of which would signal the market pricing in a sustained reopening. Conversely, a failure for the TD3C tanker rate to fall below Worldscale 150 within a week of the announcement would indicate ongoing distrust among shipowners. The reaction of Saudi Aramco's official selling prices for August loading will be a critical signal of producer confidence.
The effect on retail gasoline prices operates with a significant lag, typically 6-8 weeks. The primary initial impact is on the crude oil feedstock cost for refineries. If the closure persists, the cost of delivering crude to refineries in Europe and Asia rises, squeezing refinery margins. This can eventually lead to higher wholesale gasoline prices, which then filter down to pumps. The current rerouting has already added an estimated $2-3 per barrel to delivered crude costs for European refiners.
The most direct precedent is the 2019 crisis, involving tanker attacks and seizures. That event caused a sharp but short-lived spike in prices and insurance. A more severe historical analogue is the 1984-1987 Tanker War during the Iran-Iraq conflict, where over 400 commercial vessels were attacked. That period saw a sustained increase in global oil prices and led to the reflagging of Kuwaiti tankers under U.S. naval protection, a precedent for current discussions of military convoys.
Publicly listed tanker owners with high exposure include Hafnia (HAFNIY), which has a large fleet of product tankers operating in the region, and Kuwait Oil Tanker Company (KOTC), though it is state-owned. For investors, the broader proxy is the Guggenheim Shipping ETF (SEA), which holds global shipping equities. Its performance is highly correlated to spot tanker rate indices like the Baltic Dirty Tanker Index (BDTI), which has been volatile during the crisis.
The deal's success depends less on diplomacy and more on convincing commercial shipowners to risk assets worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Navigate market volatility with professional tools
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.