Senate Votes to Block Iran War, Rebuking Trump on June 24
1h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
iranus-senate
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
The United States Senate passed a resolution on June 24, 2026, to halt offensive military operations against Iran. The vote, which followed a similar measure from the House of Representatives, represents a direct legislative challenge to former President Donald Trump. The specific resolution invokes the 1973 War Powers Act. The joint congressional action is a rare rebuke of a former president's foreign policy posture and aims to constrain executive military authority, as reported by investing.com.
Congress has invoked the War Powers Act to check presidential military action 16 times since 2001. The most significant recent precedent was a 2019 vote to end US military support for the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen. That measure passed the Senate with 54 votes but was vetoed by the sitting president. The current vote occurs against a backdrop of heightened Middle East tensions, with Brent crude averaging $84 per barrel over the prior month. US benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude traded near $81.
The immediate catalyst was a series of military movements reported near the Strait of Hormuz in early June. These movements, attributed to former President Trump's strategic advisors, signaled a potential escalation path. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee advanced the blocking resolution on June 18. The full Senate vote passed with 58 supporting votes, including several members from the former president's own party.
The Senate resolution passed with 58 votes in favor and 42 against. This total falls short of the 67-vote threshold required to override a presidential veto. The House version passed the previous week with 228 votes, also below the two-thirds veto-proof majority. The market reaction was immediate but contained. Brent crude futures fell 2.1% to $82.25 per barrel following the news. WTI crude dropped 2.4% to $78.90.
Major defense contractors saw moderate selling pressure. The iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) declined 0.8% in the session following the vote announcement. Lockheed Martin (LMT) shares fell 1.2%, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) dipped 0.9%. The broader S&P 500 Index was flat, trading at 5,620. The volatility index (VIX) declined 5 basis points to 13.8, indicating a marginal reduction in near-term equity market fear.
| Asset | Pre-Vote Level (June 23) | Post-Vote Level (June 24) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brent Crude (per barrel) | $84.00 | $82.25 | -2.1% |
| Defense ETF (ITA) | $124.50 | $123.50 | -0.8% |
| 10-Year Treasury Yield | 4.05% | 4.02% | -3 bps |
The vote's primary market effect is a recalibration of the geopolitical risk premium embedded in oil prices. Analysts estimate 4 to 6 dollars of the recent oil price was attributable to Iran conflict fears. The immediate 2% price drop suggests only a partial removal of that premium, as execution risk remains. Clear beneficiaries include airlines and transportation sectors, where fuel is a primary input cost. Delta Air Lines (DAL) and United Airlines (UAL) both gained over 1.5% on the session.
Defense sector losses are likely limited. Major contractors like Raytheon Technologies (RTX) and General Dynamics (GD) derive less than 5% of revenue from potential Iran-specific engagements. Long-term modernization budgets, set by the annual National Defense Authorization Act, remain unchanged. The political risk is asymmetrical. A sustained legislative blockade could pressure valuations for pure-play munitions and tactical systems firms. A counter-argument suggests the vote may provoke a more aggressive foreign policy stance from the former president, ironically raising long-term risks.
Positioning data shows institutional investors were net short oil volatility instruments in the week leading to the vote. Flow tracking indicates rotation into long-duration Treasury bonds, with the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) seeing its largest daily inflow in three weeks. Hedge fund net exposure to defense stocks declined by 15% month-over-year according to prime broker reports.
The immediate next step is potential reconciliation of the House and Senate resolutions. A unified bill could reach the former president's desk by July 15. Markets will monitor for any signing statement or executive order in response. The next key catalyst is the quarterly earnings cycle for major defense primes, beginning with Lockheed Martin on July 23. Guidance on international sales and backlog will be scrutinized for any Iran-related commentary.
For crude oil, the $80 level for WTI and $83 for Brent now serve as technical support, reflecting a reduced conflict premium. A sustained break below these levels would signal the market views the legislative action as durable. The 10-year Treasury yield holding below 4.05% would confirm a continued safe-haven bid. The next OPEC+ meeting on July 3 will provide clarity on whether the group adjusts supply in response to lowered geopolitical risk.
The resolution directly reduces the probability of a supply disruption from the Strait of Hormuz, through which 21% of global daily oil consumption passes. Historical precedents, like the de-escalation of US-Venezuela tensions in 2019, saw a 5-8 dollar per barrel risk premium evaporate over two months. The current price drop is a first-step adjustment. Sustained lower prices depend on OPEC+ discipline and global demand trends unaffected by the resolution.
The political dynamic differs significantly. The 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iraq received broad bipartisan support, passing the Senate 77-23. The 2026 vote is a blocking action against a specific potential conflict, not an authorization. It also targets a former president, not a sitting commander-in-chief, creating a novel constitutional test. The vote margin is tighter, reflecting today's deeply polarized political environment compared to the post-9/11 era.
Legislative success is rare. Since its passage, Congress has never successfully used the War Powers Act to terminate a military engagement against a presidential veto. The act has been more effective as a political signaling tool and a mechanism for forcing public debate. Its primary market impact comes from shaping investor expectations about the duration and scale of potential conflicts, thereby altering the risk calculus for commodities and related equities.
The Senate vote temporarily reduces the geopolitical risk premium in oil but faces significant hurdles to become durable law.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Navigate market volatility with professional tools
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.