Scott Bessent Unveils ‘3 Through 3’ Plan to Counter Structural Inflation
1h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
structural inflationtariffs
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Scott Bessent, founder and chief investment officer of Key Square Capital Management, publicly defended a comprehensive reboot of U.S. tariff policy as a necessary response to persistent structural inflation pressures. In a presentation delivered on June 26, 2026, the prominent macro investor detailed a specific policy framework he termed '3 Through 3,' which aims to guide inflation back toward the Federal Reserve's 2% target. Bessent argued that traditional monetary policy alone is insufficient to combat inflation pressures stemming from de-globalization and renewed industrial policy. His proposal calls for an initial, across-the-board 3% tariff on all imports, a move he claims could contribute to a significant and sustained reduction in core inflation metrics over a multi-year horizon.
Macro investors are grappling with an inflation regime that has proven more persistent than the transitory narrative dominant from 2021-2023. The core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, the Fed's preferred gauge, has remained above 2.5% for 22 consecutive months as of May 2026. This backdrop signals a shift from cyclical to structural inflation, driven by supply-chain reconfigurations, demographic shifts reducing labor supply, and heightened geopolitical tensions affecting commodity flows.
The catalyst for Bessent's detailed proposal is the perceived failure of the Federal Reserve's current restrictive stance to decisively break inflationary psychology. Despite the Fed funds target rate holding at a 5.50%-5.75% range for over 12 months, inflation expectations embedded in 5-year, 5-year forward breakeven rates remain anchored near 2.8%. This environment has spurred policy experimentation. Historical precedent exists for using trade policy as an inflation-fighting tool; the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which raised duties on over 20,000 imported goods, was in part a response to deflationary agricultural pressures, though its broader economic impact was severe.
A renewed political focus on manufacturing self-sufficiency and strategic competition has created a more receptive environment for tariff-based proposals. The 2025 iteration of the National Defense Authorization Act expanded the definition of 'economic security' to include supply-chain resilience for critical materials, providing a legal and political framework for more aggressive trade measures.
Bessent's '3 Through 3' framework hinges on specific numerical targets and their projected economic impact. The plan proposes an initial 3% tariff on all imports, estimated to generate approximately $150 billion in annual federal revenue based on 2025 import levels of $3.4 trillion. Key Square's internal modeling suggests this could reduce core PCE inflation by 40 to 60 basis points over an 18-month implementation period.
Current inflation data underscores the challenge. Core CPI stands at 3.1% year-over-year as of May 2026, while core PCE is at 2.7%. This contrasts with the pre-pandemic decade average for core PCE of 1.6%. The 10-year Treasury yield, a benchmark for long-term inflation expectations, trades at 4.2%, notably higher than its 2.0% average in the 2010s.
| Metric | Pre-Pandemic Avg (2010-2019) | Current Level (May 2026) | Proposed Impact (Key Square Model) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core PCE Inflation | 1.6% | 2.7% | Reduced by 40-60 bps |
| Tariff Level on Imports | ~1.5% (weighted avg) | ~2.1% | Raised to 3.0% |
| 10-Year Treasury Yield | 2.4% | 4.2% | N/A |
Import volume growth has slowed to 1.2% year-over-year, down from an average of 4.8% in the five years preceding the pandemic, indicating shifting trade patterns.
Sectoral impacts of a generalized 3% tariff would be asymmetric. Domestic industrial and manufacturing firms with limited import competition stand to benefit most. Tickers like Caterpillar (CAT) and Deere & Company (DE), which produce heavy machinery domestically, could see margin expansion as imported alternatives become more expensive. The steel sector, including Nucor (NUE), would be a direct beneficiary, potentially boosting earnings per share by 5-8% based on prior tariff episodes.
Conversely, consumer discretionary retailers and automakers reliant on global supply chains face significant headwinds. Companies like Best Buy (BBY) and General Motors (GM) would see immediate cost pressures. The technology hardware sector, dependent on complex Asian supply chains, would also be negatively affected, with firms like Apple (AAPL) potentially facing gross margin compression of 50-100 basis points. A major counter-argument is the risk of retaliatory tariffs from trading partners, which could trigger a trade war and negate any domestic inflation benefits while harming export-oriented sectors like agriculture and aerospace.
Positioning data shows macro hedge funds have been increasing exposure to long positions in U.S. small-cap industrials, which are more domestically focused, while shorting basket ETFs for multinational consumer staples. Flow analysis indicates capital moving into sectors with high economic moats and pricing power, anticipating a less globalized, higher-cost operating environment.
The next major catalyst is the July 25, 2026, release of the Q2 Employment Cost Index (ECI). A print above 1.1% quarter-over-quarter would reinforce the structural wage inflation narrative and likely increase political appetite for non-monetary interventions like tariffs. The August Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium, scheduled for August 27-29, will be critical for gauging Federal Reserve officials' openness to coordinating policy with fiscal and trade tools.
Market levels to monitor include the 10-year breakeven inflation rate; a sustained move above 2.5% would signal deteriorating confidence in the Fed's standalone ability to meet its target. Support for the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) is seen at the 104.50 level; a breakout above 107.00 could indicate markets pricing in a more protectionist, capital-attractive policy shift. If the core PCE print for June, released on July 31, remains above 2.6%, pressure will intensify on the Biden administration to consider alternative anti-inflation measures ahead of the November elections.
A universal 3% tariff would act as a direct tax on imported goods, raising their final retail prices. The pass-through effect is not 1:1, as retailers and distributors may absorb some cost. Key Square's analysis suggests a 3% tariff could add 0.4% to 0.7% directly to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in the first year. Over the longer term, the intended effect is to incentivize domestic production, which could increase supply and theoretically lower prices, but this re-shoring process would take several years and require significant capital investment.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Position yourself for the macro moves discussed above
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.