Quant Ratings Reveal Extreme Winners and Losers in Tech Earnings
1h ago|3 min readQuick Read
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
quantitative-analysistechnology-stocks
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Quantitative analysis of large-cap technology stocks following the Q1 2026 earnings season has identified extreme divergences in factor-based ratings. A report from May 26, 2026, highlighted a nearly two-point gap between the highest-rated and lowest-rated companies with market capitalizations above $10 billion. The scores, which aggregate metrics like valuation, growth, profitability, and momentum, provide a systematic view of post-earnings sentiment and potential institutional flows.
Quantitative models have gained prominence among institutional investors as a method to remove emotional bias from stock selection. These systems analyze hundreds of data points to generate a composite score, typically on a 1-5 scale. The current market environment, characterized by the 10-year Treasury yield at 4.28% and the S&P 500 up 7.5% year-to-date, places a premium on identifying quality and growth at a reasonable price. The conclusion of a volatile earnings season served as the catalyst for significant score changes. Widespread artificial intelligence investments and shifting enterprise software demand triggered major revisions to future earnings projections, which are heavily weighted in quant models. This created a clear stratification between companies perceived as winners and losers in the new tech cycle.
The quantitative rating system assigns scores from 1.0 (very bearish) to 5.0 (very bullish). Following earnings, the highest-rated large-cap tech stock achieved a score of 4.8, while the lowest-rated stock fell to 3.0. This 1.8-point differential is 25% wider than the average gap observed over the previous four quarters. The top-rated company, a semiconductor firm, saw its one-month price momentum surge to +22% against a sector average of +5%. The lowest-rated entity, a cloud infrastructure provider, reported a quarterly revenue growth slowdown to 8% year-over-year, missing the consensus estimate of 14%. Its stock declined 18% on the earnings announcement, erasing approximately $35 billion in market capitalization. The median rating for the large-cap tech universe held steady at 3.9.
| Metric | Top-Rated Stock | Bottom-Rated Stock |
|---|---|---|
| Quant Score | 4.8 | 3.0 |
| 1-Month Price Chg | +22% | -18% |
| Forward P/E Ratio | 28x | 15x |
The extreme rating divergence is a strong signal for sector rotation, likely prompting systematic funds to increase weightings in high-scoring names and reduce exposure to low-scoring ones. Semiconductors and hardware manufacturers linked to AI datacenter build-outs are the primary beneficiaries, with quant scores clustering above 4.5. Conversely, legacy software and consumer-facing tech companies with slowing growth profiles face sustained selling pressure. A key risk to this analysis is that quant models are inherently backward-looking and may be slow to price in a fundamental turnaround for the lowest-rated stocks. Flow data indicates hedge funds have been net sellers of the bottom-quintile tech stocks by quant score for three consecutive weeks, while exchange-traded funds tracking momentum factors have seen significant inflows.
The durability of these quant ratings will be tested by upcoming catalysts, including the Fed's policy decision on June 17 and the next round of monthly CPI data on June 12. A key level for the lowest-rated stock is its 200-day moving average, which it is currently trading 12% below; a failure to reclaim this level could trigger further model-based selling. For the highest-rated names, investors will monitor whether forward earnings estimates are revised higher following analyst briefings throughout June. The next major earnings season in late July will be the ultimate test for the quant models' current assertions.
A quant rating is a composite score generated by algorithmic models that analyze a company's financial and market data. These models evaluate factors like valuation, growth, profitability, price momentum, and earnings revisions. The output, typically a score from 1 to 5, provides a systematic, non-discretionary assessment of a stock's investment appeal. This helps institutional investors quickly screen large universes of stocks and manage portfolio risk based on empirical data rather than subjective opinion.
Quant scores have demonstrated a strong historical correlation with medium-term stock performance, particularly in efficient sectors like technology. However, their reliability can diminish during sudden market regime shifts or during events that are not yet reflected in historical financial data, such as a disruptive new product or a major regulatory change. They are most effective as one tool within a broader investment process, not as a standalone predictor.
Outside of technology, quantitative models are currently assigning high scores to select segments of the energy and industrials sectors. Companies involved in grid infrastructure and industrial automation are showing strong factor scores, driven by upward revisions to earnings estimates and positive price momentum. These areas benefit from similar long-term investment themes as top tech stocks, including AI infrastructure and supply chain reshoring.
Quant models signal a sharp bifurcation in tech, favoring AI-centric hardware over growth-slowing software.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Trade 800+ global stocks & ETFs
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.