Oil Surges After Iran Conflict; US Gas Could Rise
March 30, 20267m read1Standard
Fazen Markets Research
AI-Enhanced Analysis
oilgas pricesIranWTIfazen capital
Global crude prices have re-priced materially since early March following direct military strikes linked to Iran on March 7 and subsequent escalatory incidents through late March 2026. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) has climbed roughly 10-15% between March 7 and March 27, 2026, while Brent has appreciated near 8-12% over the same period (Yahoo Finance, Mar 28, 2026). US retail gasoline prices have begun to reflect upstream pressure: the national average reported by AAA was $3.82 per gallon on March 27, 2026, up about 6% since early March and approximately 18% year-over-year (AAA, Mar 27, 2026). US crude inventories fell by an estimated 6.8 million barrels in the EIA Weekly Petroleum Status Report dated March 25, 2026, tightening the market and supporting higher near-term hydrocarbon prices (EIA, Mar 25, 2026). This article dissects the drivers behind the move, quantifies the transmission to pump prices, contrasts the current episode with prior geopolitical shocks, and outlines scenarios that could either amplify or blunt further increases in gasoline costs.
The immediate shock to oil markets in March 2026 followed direct military action and a spike in regional tensions involving Iran, which disrupted perceptions of Strait of Hormuz security and insurance costs for tanker voyages. Markets are pricing a premium for route risk and the potential for sanctions or asset seizures that would constrain exports from Iran and, in a worst case, affect Gulf flows more broadly. Historically, comparable geopolitical shocks — for example, the 2019 tanker attacks and the 2019-2020 tensions around Iran — produced multi-week price spikes that normalized over 2-4 months once physical flows and insurance mechanisms adjusted. The current adjustment appears larger in part because global spare capacity is slimmer today.
Structural supply considerations amplify the sensitivity of prices to geopolitical events. The International Energy Agency (IEA) and OPEC have repeatedly highlighted that global effective spare crude production capacity fell to roughly 1-2 million barrels per day (mb/d) in early 2026, compared with 3-4 mb/d in several years prior (IEA/OPEC reporting, Q1 2026). When spare capacity is constrained, relatively modest perceived production or export risks translate into outsized price moves. In addition, refinery utilization in the United States was running near 90-92% in March, limiting the ability of refiners to absorb a crude shock and quickly ramp gasoline output, according to weekly refinery data compiled by the EIA (EIA, Mar 2026).
Demand-side fundamentals also matter. Global oil demand estimates for 2026 remain resilient; the IEA's March 2026 short-term outlook suggested demand growth of around 1.1 mb/d year-over-year, driven by non-OECD markets and resilient transportation activity. That demand backdrop, coupled with supply tightness, explains why spot markets have been receptive to geopolitical headlines. Traders are pricing both the immediate premium for elevated risk and a higher forward curve reflecting potential sustained disruptions.
Price action: WTI crude traded in a range that saw roughly a 10-15% appreciation from the first week of March through March 27, 2026 (Yahoo Finance, Mar 28, 2026). Brent followed with somewhat lower relative gains, around 8-12%, reflecting its broader supplier base and slightly deeper liquidity. The near-term WTI-Brent spread widened briefly but has since normalized to historically typical levels, indicating that the US domestic market reacted more sharply to headline risk than the broader Atlantic basin balance.
Inventory metrics: The EIA Weekly Petroleum Status Report (Mar 25, 2026) recorded a decline of 6.8 million barrels in US crude stocks week-over-week, a larger-than-seasonal withdrawal and the biggest single-week drop in several months. Product inventories showed mixed signals: gasoline inventories recorded modest draws consistent with the season and refinery run schedules, while distillate stocks remained relatively stable. Comparatively, gasoline demand averaged roughly 9.1 million barrels per day in the preceding four weeks (EIA, Mar 2026), roughly flat versus the same period in 2025 but above the longer-term five-year seasonal average.
Retail transmission: The AAA national average gasoline price of $3.82 per gallon on March 27, 2026, represents a 6% increase since early March and an 18% year-over-year increase (AAA, Mar 27, 2026). Regional variance is important: California pump prices exceeded $4.90/gal in late March, while several inland states remained below $3.40/gal, reflecting refinery configurations, state taxes, and California's LCFS and RFG program impacts. Historically, a sustained $10/bbl move in crude correlates with a roughly $0.25-$0.35/gal move in US retail gasoline within 4-8 weeks, with variation by region and seasonality.
Oil producers and integrated majors: Higher near-term prices boost upstream cash flow and provide optionality for capital allocation. US shale operators, which accounted for the majority of non-OPEC supply growth in recent years, can respond by modestly increasing rig counts; Baker Hughes data historically shows a lag of 3-6 months between sustained price rises and a meaningful uptick in drilling activity. However, the industry's ability to expand production quickly is constrained by labor and service-cost inflation and by company-level discipline on shareholder returns, meaning that supply response will likely be gradual rather than immediate.
Refiners and gasoline margins: Refiners initially benefit from wider crude-product spreads, but the net effect depends on feedstock costs, refinery configuration, and maintenance schedules. Tight refinery runs in the United States limited product output in late March, pressuring pump prices. Complex refiners with high gasoline yields may see improved margins if cracks widen, but those with heavy-sour configurations that rely on heavy-grade crude could face narrowing margins if light sweet differentials widen. Liquidity in the midstream — storage and pipeline capacity — also determines whether refinery output can be redistributed to high-price regions rapidly.
Consumers and fiscal policy: Higher gasoline costs exert immediate pressure on discretionary spending in the US and other import-dependent economies. Policymakers may respond if prices accelerate; examples include targeted fuel subsidies, strategic reserve releases, or temporary tax reliefs. The International Monetary Fund and World Bank monitor such developments because higher energy prices can reduce real incomes and complicate inflation and monetary policy outlooks. For investors, transportation and consumption-exposed sectors will show differentiated performance depending on fuel intensity and hedging strategies.
Geopolitical escalation remains the principal near-term risk and could push prices materially higher if shipping lanes are disrupted or if key Gulf producers reduce exports. A supply disruption of 1 mb/d or greater would likely translate into $10-$20/bbl upside on order flow and risk premia, based on historical episodes. Conversely, diplomatic de-escalation or coordinated releases from strategic petroleum reserves could relieve upward pressure; the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve holds several hundred million barrels, and coordinated releases have reduced price spikes in prior episodes.
Macro and demand risks are second-order but consequential. A sharper-than-expected slowdown in China or Europe would remove the demand cushion that has supported prices to date. The forward curve already prices some probability of slower growth: prompt-month spreads have moved into modest backwardation compared with the 12-month strip, signaling tightness now but uncertain later. Additionally, a faster than expected shale recovery or resumption of Venezuelan exports under a new political arrangement could add supply that limits sustained price gains.
Market structure risks include dwindling refinery capacity in key regions and limited tanker availability due to insurance cost spikes. Insurance premiums on Gulf transits have increased meaningfully since early March, raising freight costs and effectively raising landed crude prices for refiners reliant on seaborne imports. These frictions can persist beyond the cessation of hostilities and keep regional price differentials elevated.
Our base case view is that the market is correctly pricing heightened short-term risk but overstates the probability of a sustained, multi-quarter cessation of Gulf flows. While a knee-jerk premium is rational given tight spare capacity (IEA/OPEC, Q1 2026), we think physical logistics and market adaptation should blunt the long-run price impulse unless there is a clear, prolonged production outage. Historically, markets have absorbed repeated geopolitical shocks through insurance market adjustments, re-routing, and incremental supply from non-affected producers; we expect the same mechanisms to operate here.
Contrarian insight: the current price structure rewards a selective marginal supply increase more than headline narratives suggest. If US shale operators marginally expand output and OPEC+ maintains even flat production while demand growth slows by 0.2-0.4 mb/d over the next two quarters, the forward curve could ease materially. That scenario would compress gasoline margins and reduce retail pressure. Investors should therefore consider dispersion within energy: not all producers benefit equally from a geopolitical premium; companies with low per-barrel decline rates and flexible lifting profiles are better positioned compared with high-cost, high-decline assets.
Operationally, refiners with export optionality and access to floating storage will outperform peers in managing regional crack volatility. Similarly, midstream firms with capacity to re-route barrels to more attractive refining centers offer convexity to both upside and downside moves. For further reading on how midstream flexibility affects returns, see our recent insights on refining and logistics topic and on energy supply response topic.
Q: How quickly do refinery runs respond to crude price increases and how does that affect pump prices?
A: Refinery runs respond on a schedule constrained by maintenance windows and product demand seasonality; typical adjustments take 2-6 weeks to materialize. If crude spikes are sustained for more than a month, refiners may increase runs if economics justify it, which can alleviate gasoline tightness within 4-8 weeks. However, structural constraints like available capacity and reformulation requirements (e.g., seasonal gasoline blends) can delay full transmission.
Q: Could strategic reserve releases fully offset the current price moves?
A: Strategic reserve releases can provide immediate relief to physical tightness and market sentiment, but their effect is often time-limited unless accompanied by additional supply or demand abatement. Past coordinated releases equivalent to several tens of millions of barrels lowered price spikes for a few weeks to months; to permanently offset a multi-month production shortfall of 1 mb/d would require sustained releases or equivalent production increases from other suppliers, which is unlikely without significant coordination.
The Iran-linked escalation in March 2026 has driven a meaningful near-term repricing in oil and begun to transmit to gasoline; while a short-run premium is warranted given tight spare capacity and inventory draws, the longer-term outcome depends on whether supply can be restored or demand softens. Policymakers and market participants should prepare for continued volatility, with regional disparities in pump prices likely to persist.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
Sponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.