Oil Climbs 1.5% But Set for 10% Weekly Drop as Hormuz Stands Still
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Oil prices are attempting a modest recovery on August 7, with WTI crude trading up 1.5%. Despite today’s gain, the commodity is poised for its second consecutive weekly decline, with a loss of nearly 10% on the week. The tentative bounce occurs against a backdrop of stalled diplomacy, as a reported transit agreement between Iran and Oman for the Strait of Hormuz remains unsigned and unimplemented. According to tracking data cited by investinglive.com on August 7, vessel traffic through the critical waterway has collapsed to a single-digit daily average, creating a persistent supply constraint that traders are currently overlooking in favor of optimistic headlines. As of 05:37 UTC today, TGT was trading at $147.08, down 0.70%, and NEAR was priced at $1.62, down 5.88% over 24 hours with a market cap of $2.11 billion.
The Strait of Hormuz is the world’s most important oil transit chokepoint, handling roughly one-fifth of global seaborne crude and condensate flows. Any sustained disruption there has immediate and outsized effects on global energy prices and shipping insurance premiums. The current geopolitical standoff dates to March, when tensions first escalated, leading to attacks on shipping and the initial slowdown in traffic. The situation deteriorated in July with a series of projectile attacks targeting vessels, including those attempting to use an Omani-proposed corridor, effectively halting commercial confidence in the route.
The catalyst for the recent price volatility is a diplomatic effort, reportedly led by the US, to broker a transit agreement between Iran and Oman. While an in-principle agreement on shipping lanes is believed to be in place, the final text remains unapproved. The macro backdrop includes markets digesting mixed signals from US policymakers, with official optimism about resolving the crisis conflicting with a tangible lack of progress on the water. The current standstill, now stretching into its second week of August, adds weeks of tightening supply to a market that had already adjusted to lower flows since the spring.
Independent ship tracking data shows a stark reality on the water. Since August 3, the daily average number of vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz has been in the single digits. This figure excludes the so-called shadow fleet and dark transits, meaning the visible, legitimate commercial traffic is almost nonexistent. This represents a near-total standstill compared to historical norms where dozens of tankers would transit daily. The supply impact is compounded by a proposed Iranian bill that seeks to bar US, Israeli, and other "hostile" vessels from any future agreed transit route, with fines of up to 20% of cargo value for non-compliance.
Price action tells a conflicting story. Despite the physical bottleneck, WTI crude oil is set to close the week down approximately 10%, marking back-to-back weekly declines. The price chart shows a pattern where the market has opened with significant downward gaps at the start of each of the past two weeks and failed to close them by Friday's close. In today's session, WTI managed to climb back above its 100-hour moving average, a short-term technical level traders watch. The trading range for TGT as of this morning was $146.31 to $149.44, reflecting muted volatility in that equity compared to the energy complex.
The disconnect between physical supply realities and price action indicates traders are heavily discounting geopolitical risk in favor of hopeful diplomatic rhetoric. This positioning leaves the market vulnerable to a sharp repricing if the status quo persists or worsens. The primary beneficiaries of a prolonged closure are alternative crude exporters not reliant on the Strait, such as those in the Atlantic Basin, and companies involved in longer-haul shipping routes that bypass the Middle East. Conversely, Asian refiners heavily dependent on Gulf crude face higher landed costs and compressed margins.
A key counter-argument is that global inventories remain adequate and demand signals are soft, allowing the market to absorb a short-term disruption. However, the risk is that the "short-term" disruption extends, gradually drawing down buffers. Flow data suggests speculative money has been reducing net-long positions in crude futures, contributing to the weekly price declines. Meanwhile, physical traders dealing with actual cargoes are likely facing severe logistical challenges and soaring freight rates for rerouted voyages, a cost not immediately reflected in headline futures prices.
The immediate catalyst is the finalization and implementation of the Iran-Oman transit agreement. Without a signed text and a clear start date, the standstill continues. Market participants should monitor official statements from Tehran and Muscat for any breakthrough. A secondary catalyst is the progress of the Iranian bill to bar specific nations' vessels, which would further complicate any operational agreement. The next set of weekly inventory data from the US Energy Information Administration will provide evidence of how effectively global supply chains are adapting to the rerouted flows.
On the price chart, the $80 per barrel level for WTI is a key psychological and technical resistance area that buyers will target if today’s rebound holds. Sustained trade above the 100-hour moving average is a prerequisite for that move. Failure to hold today’s gains would likely see a retest of the weekly lows. The 24-hour trading volume for NEAR, at $123.24 million, indicates significant activity in digital asset markets, but correlations with oil remain unstable and are not a reliable guide for energy traders.
A prolonged closure directly reduces the global supply of crude oil, the primary feedstock for gasoline. Historically, such disruptions lead to higher refinery input costs, which are typically passed on to consumers at the pump after a lag of several weeks. The impact is most acute in regions like Europe and Asia that rely heavily on crude imports from the Persian Gulf. US consumers may be partially insulated due to significant domestic production, but global price benchmarks still influence local markets.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Trade gold, silver & commodities — zero commission
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.