Market Sell-Off Spurs Tax-Smart Moves

Lead

The market sell-off of late March 2026 has reopened tactical opportunities for investors to materially improve after-tax returns through established tax-aware measures. On Mar 24, 2026 CNBC highlighted a renewed interest in loss harvesting, Roth conversions and rebalancing as market values corrected (CNBC, Mar 24, 2026). These moves are not a substitute for asset-allocation decisions, but they change after-tax economics: for example, U.S. tax rules allow up to $3,000 of net capital losses to be deducted against ordinary income per year, with excess losses carried forward indefinitely (IRS.gov, "Capital Gains and Losses", accessed Mar 2026). Practically, that creates an annualized tax buffer investors can deploy while waiting for markets to recover.

More than a portfolio tactic, tax management is a timing and execution problem. The wash-sale rule bars matching repurchases within a 30-day window, and that constraint requires active planning around trade dates and substitute securities (IRS, "Wash Sale Rule"). Likewise, Roth conversions executed during down markets can lock lower taxable values into a tax-free growth vehicle, but they impose an immediate tax bill that must be anticipated and modeled. Institutional-grade implementation requires coordinating trading, tax accounts and liquidity to pay conversion tax without depriming the investment plan.

This piece examines the mechanics and magnitudes of three core tax-smart responses to a sell-off: tax-loss harvesting, opportunistic Roth conversions, and tax-aware rebalancing between taxable and tax-advantaged accounts. We quantify illustrative outcomes, cite regulatory guardrails, and contrast outcomes against a simple “do nothing” hold strategy. Throughout, we reference data and guidance from the CNBC coverage (Mar 24, 2026), IRS publications and Fazen Capital’s internal modeling to show where the arithmetic of tax rules materially alters investor outcomes.

Context

Tax-loss harvesting resurfaces every significant downturn because realized losses can be used immediately or in future years to offset capital gains and, up to $3,000 per year, ordinary income. The IRS allows capital loss carryforwards indefinitely, which means a large realized loss during a sell-off can provide a multi-year stream of tax relief (IRS.gov, "Capital Gains and Losses"). Historically, investors who systematically harvest losses during down cycles have reduced effective tax drag compared with passive taxable buy-and-hold peers, particularly when paired with careful avoidance of wash-sale disallowances.

The wash-sale rule—the 30-calendar-day prohibition on repurchasing substantially identical securities—serves as the principal operational constraint. Brokers and custodians flag wash sales for retail accounts, but institutional implementation requires bespoke substitute securities or timing strategies that preserve market exposure without technical re-acquisition. The rule’s existence creates a modest tracking error risk if substitutes diverge, and it elevates execution cost for smaller-cap or less liquid strategies.

Roth conversions become attractive when taxable account valuations fall because the tax base for conversion is lower: converting $100,000 of assets at depressed prices results in a smaller immediate tax bill than converting after a rebound. This trade-off—pay taxes now at a lower valuation in exchange for later tax-free appreciation—depends on anticipated future tax rates, expected returns and the investor’s time horizon. It is fundamentally a tax-policy and rate-timing bet, not a market-timing bet, and should be modeled as such.

Data Deep Dive

We rely on three concrete data points to ground the analysis. First, CNBC published guidance on Mar 24, 2026 emphasizing loss harvesting and conversions as actionable responses to the market downturn (CNBC, Mar 24, 2026). Second, IRS rules cap the deductible net capital loss against ordinary income at $3,000 per year for individuals ($1,500 if married filing separately) with unused losses carried forward indefinitely (IRS.gov, "Capital Gains and Losses"). Third, the wash-sale disallowance applies across a 30-day lookback and lookforward window, complicating repurchase timing (IRS.gov, "Wash Sale Rule"). These regulatory anchors shape the arithmetic.

Illustrative arithmetic: realize $50,000 of capital losses in Year 1, with no capital gains in that year. At the $3,000 offset limit, an investor reduces ordinary income by $3,000 in Year 1 and carries forward $47,000; the carried-forward losses can offset future capital gains or $3,000 per year of ordinary income until exhausted. If the investor’s marginal tax rate is 22%, that $3,000 reduces federal tax by roughly $660 annually until other gains absorb the loss. If instead the investor nets the $50,000 against $50,000 of realized gains in Year 2, the tax avoidance is immediate and substantial. These are mechanical outcomes, not investment recommendations.

Comparisons matter: harvesting losses during a 10% drawdown delivers a different scale of benefit than harvesting during a 40% drawdown. For a $1m taxable portfolio, a 10% decline equates to $100,000 of paper losses; realizing a portion of that and redeploying into substitutes can generate multi-year tax relief and rebalance to target without a taxable gain. By contrast, during a smaller drawdown the opportunity cost of crystallizing losses and incurring transaction costs may outweigh tax savings. The right decision depends on portfolio size, cost basis distribution, and expected realization of future gains.

Sector Implications

For equities-heavy taxable portfolios, tax-loss harvesting is often the most direct lever to improve after-tax returns in the near term. Passive ETFs generally generate fewer taxable distributions than active mutual funds, which means ETFs can be both an instrument for harvesting (sell shares with losses) and a comparative benchmark for tax efficiency. Studies have shown ETFs distribute less in realized capital gains than diversified mutual funds on average; for taxable investors this structural difference compounds during volatile periods when mutual funds may be forced to sell to meet redemptions.

Fixed-income and alternative holdings present different trade-offs. Taxable bond funds and Muni bond portfolios require separate analyses: taxable bond losses are often limited and carry different duration and coupon dynamics; municipal bonds provide tax-exempt income but can generate capital gains or losses on sale. Alternative strategies that are illiquid or have high transaction costs may not be ideal candidates for active tax-loss harvesting because the transaction frictions can consume the tax benefits.

For institutional investors servicing taxable clients—family offices, high-net-worth individuals or UCITS-equivalent structures—the operational implications are significant. Systems must track lots at the tax-basis level, enforce a 30-day wash-sale policy, and implement substitute selection rules. Fazen Capital’s operations group emphasizes automated lot selection, pre-trade compliance checks and after-trade wash-sale accounting to preserve tax outcomes while limiting tracking error.

Risk Assessment

Tax-aware trades introduce execution and tax-timing risk. Improperly executed wash-sale avoidance can lead to loss disallowance and retroactive tax liabilities, including interest and penalties. Tax-loss harvesting that increases turnover can elevate transaction costs and market impact; those costs should be quantified against expected tax benefits before implementation. Moreover, Roth conversions reduce taxable assets available to pay the conversion tax if the investor lacks external liquidity, which can force unwanted asset sales in stressed markets.

Policy risk is non-trivial. Changes to capital gains taxation or limitations on Roth conversions could alter the calculus; while no imminent statutory changes are guaranteed, professional planning should assume tax rules can shift with political cycles. Investors should model scenarios with higher marginal rates and with the elimination or limitation of certain deductions to stress-test outcomes.

Finally, behavioral risks matter. Chasing losses for the sake of tax benefits without regard to investment quality can lock in poor decisions. The optimal harvest always sits within an investment policy framework that treats tax management as an overlay, not a substitute for security selection or diversification discipline.

Fazen Capital Perspective

Fazen Capital’s proprietary modeling suggests a counterintuitive point: in many cases, partial harvesting combined with calibrated Roth conversions produces superior after-tax outcomes compared with either tactic in isolation. Specifically, realizing losses up to the point of filling low-tax-bracket capacity in the current year while performing modest Roth conversions on depressed asset values can convert what would be wasted carryforwards into tax-free growth pockets. For example, converting $25,000 in a low-tax year when valuations are down can lock a smaller tax bill and reduce future ordinary-income exposure for that tranche.

We caution against a binary view—harvest everything or nothing. Our stress tests, using a range of market recoveries (V-shaped, U-shaped, and extended grind), show that staggered harvesting over 2–3 years often produces better realized tax savings than a single-year wholesale crystallization, especially when paired with disciplined substitution to avoid wash-sale violations. Implementing this requires lot-level analytics and pre-trade scenario outputs that project both tax and tracking-error consequences.

Institutional investors should also view tax strategy as capital allocation: funds spent to execute harvesting (transaction costs, bid-ask spreads) must be compared to the present value of expected tax savings, discounted by policy and execution risk. For fiduciaries, documenting that arithmetic and embedding it into rebalancing governance is as important as the trades themselves. For further discussion of implementation mechanics and governance, see our tax strategies and portfolio construction notes.

FAQ

Q: How quickly can harvested losses be used to offset capital gains? A: Realized capital losses reduce taxable gains in the same tax year; if gains are insufficient, up to $3,000 can offset ordinary income and the remainder carries forward indefinitely (IRS.gov, "Capital Gains and Losses"). Losses are settled on the trade date for tax purposes, but settlement lags and lot accounting mean custodial reporting may follow a different timeline.

Q: Do wash-sale rules apply across accounts at different brokers or to IRAs? A: Yes. The wash-sale rule applies to purchases of substantially identical securities across accounts controlled by the taxpayer, including different brokerages and IRAs. If a loss is disallowed under the wash-sale rule because of a purchase in an IRA, the disallowed loss adjusts the basis of the IRA holding rather than being deductible (IRS.gov, "Wash Sale Rule"). This complexity makes cross-account coordination essential to preserve tax benefits.

Bottom Line

The current sell-off creates real, quantifiable tax-management opportunities—up to $3,000 per year in ordinary income offsets and indefinite loss carryforwards—provided investors respect wash-sale timing and model conversion taxes against anticipated future rates. Tactical, governed implementation that integrates lot-level analytics, substitute selection and liquidity planning can convert market declines into lasting after-tax gains.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.