Iran Navy Says 15 Ships Used Strait of Hormuz in One Day
1h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
strait-of-hormuziran-navy
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Iran’s navy reported that 15 commercial vessels transited the Strait of Hormuz in the past 24 hours, with four classified as oil tankers. Investinglive.com noted on June 1, 2026, that Tehran claims the ships obtained its permission to cross the waterway. The assertion follows a period of severely depressed traffic through the global oil trade’s most critical chokepoint. Identifying the specific vessels and their destinations remains difficult, with analysts suspecting many operate within Iran’s sanctioned shadow fleet.
Daily vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz averaged above 70 before regional tensions escalated, with over 20 million barrels of oil moving daily. Recent weeks have seen that figure plummet to an average range of 15-30 total vessels per day. The sharp decline reflects heightened military risk and stringent insurance premiums following a series of maritime incidents.
Geopolitical friction between Iran and the United States has centered on nuclear negotiations and regional proxy conflicts. The current claim arrives as diplomatic channels between Washington and Tehran show tentative signs of activity. Iran’s public declaration of managed transit may serve as an optical gesture to signal control and stability to negotiating counterparts.
Control of the Strait represents a core element of Iranian strategic use. The waterway connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and is bordered by Iranian territorial waters. Any sustained disruption threatens the flow of roughly 20% of global oil consumption and 30% of seaborne traded oil.
The claim of 15 transits, including 4 oil tankers, sits below historical norms but aligns with the recent depressed average. Pre-war daily transit volumes routinely exceeded 70 vessels, with oil tankers constituting a significant portion. The current traffic represents a decline of 75-80% from that baseline.
| Metric | Pre-War Average (2025) | Recent Average (May 2026) | Iran's Claim (June 1, 2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Daily Transits | >70 vessels | 15-30 vessels | 15 vessels |
| Estimated Oil Tankers | ~25 vessels | 3-5 vessels | 4 vessels |
Shipping analytics from platforms like MarineTraffic and Vortexa frequently show discrepancies with Iranian official statements. Physical tracking data from the past week indicates an average of just 3 confirmed oil tanker transits daily. The global benchmark Brent crude traded at $84.50 per barrel on the report date, showing muted immediate reaction.
Comparative maritime risk premiums for vessels entering the Gulf have surged above 0.5% of hull value, up from 0.1% in calmer periods. The shadow fleet, estimated at over 600 tankers globally, facilitates sanctioned oil trade but operates with opaque ownership and insurance.
Any sustained increase in verified Strait transits would benefit European oil majors with significant exposure to Middle East crude, including Shell (SHEL) and TotalEnergies (TTE). Global tanker owners like Euronav (EURN) and Frontline (FRO) would see charter rate pressure ease from extreme risk premiums. The broader energy sector ETF (XLE) is sensitive to sustained supply assurance from the region.
A key limitation is the persistent gap between official claims and verifiable Automatic Identification System (AIS) data. Many shadow fleet vessels disable their transponders, creating a data void that official statements can fill without immediate contradiction. This opacity makes real-time supply chain analysis challenging for traders.
Positioning data shows commodity trading advisors and macro funds maintain elevated long positions in crude oil futures as a geopolitical risk premium. Flow analysis indicates capital is rotating toward North American energy equities and liquefied natural gas exporters as hedges against Persian Gulf volatility. Short-term freight rate swaps have seen increased speculative volume.
Market participants will scrutinize the next Joint Organization Data Initiative (JODI) oil inventory report on June 20 for signs of inventory draws linked to shipping constraints. The July 4 OPEC+ ministerial meeting will assess production policy against the backdrop of Persian Gulf shipping risks.
Key technical levels include the $82 support and $87 resistance for Brent crude. A sustained break above $87 would signal the market is pricing in a material and lasting improvement in transit security. Maritime insurers will watch for any official bulletins from the International Maritime Organization regarding safe passage assurances.
Verification hinges on consistent AIS data over the next 72 hours showing a cluster of transits. Analysts will monitor loading schedules at key export terminals like Ras Tanura in Saudi Arabia and Fujairah in the UAE for correlated activity.
Iran's shadow fleet is a network of older tankers operating with opaque ownership, often under flags of convenience like Panama or Liberia. These vessels frequently disable AIS transponders to obscure origins and destinations, facilitating the transport of sanctioned Iranian and Venezuelan crude. The fleet is estimated to exceed 250 vessels, complicating global efforts to monitor oil flows and enforce sanctions.
The Strait of Hormuz is the world's most important oil transit chokepoint. A severe, sustained disruption could remove over 20 million barrels per day from the market, potentially spiking prices by 30-50% in a short period. Markets typically price a smaller, persistent risk premium of $5-10 per barrel during periods of heightened tension, reflecting the probability of intermittent closures or attacks.
Major alternatives are limited and costly. Saudi Arabia can utilize its East-West Petroline pipeline to redirect about 5 million barrels per day from the Gulf to the Red Sea port of Yanbu. The UAE operates the Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline with 1.5 million barrels per day capacity to the Fujairah terminal on the Gulf of Oman. These pipelines bypass the Strait but lack the capacity to handle full Gulf export volumes.
Iran's transit claim is a data point in an ongoing information war, where verified shipping traffic remains far below levels needed for stable global oil supply.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Navigate market volatility with professional tools
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.