Iran Attacks Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain Escalating Oil Supply Risk
1h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
oil-pricesgeopolitical-risk
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Iran conducted simultaneous ballistic missile and drone attacks targeting Jordan's Muwaffaq Salti Air Base and energy infrastructure in Kuwait and Bahrain on June 11, 2026. The coordinated strikes mark a significant escalation beyond direct US-Iran exchanges, drawing multiple Gulf states into active defense postures and directly threatening regional oil and gas logistics chains. Brent crude futures surged 3.23% to $127.98 as of 03:17 UTC today, breaching a key technical resistance level at $128.50. The attacks immediately compound existing supply concerns stemming from periodic disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, supporting continued strength in energy commodities and safe-haven assets amid elevated volatility.
The last major direct Iranian attack on multiple Gulf states occurred in January 2025, when missiles struck oil loading facilities in Saudi Arabia's Ras Tanura port, temporarily removing 2 million barrels per day from the market and spiking Brent prices by 18% over three sessions. The current macro backdrop features structurally tight physical oil markets, with OECD commercial inventories 8% below their five-year average and forward curves in steep backwardation. The immediate catalyst is a retaliatory cycle initiated by US airstrikes on Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps positions in Syria on June 8, which itself responded to an Iranian-backed militia attack that killed three US service members in Jordan. This new multi-front engagement demonstrates Iran's willingness to broaden the conflict beyond proxy forces and directly challenge Gulf Cooperation Council members.
Brent crude futures reached an intraday high of $128.50, a level not traded since April 2026, before settling at $127.98 for a daily gain of 3.23%. The trading range for the session was notably wide at $3.13, reflecting heightened volatility and uncertainty. The United States Oil Fund (USO), an ETF tracking West Texas Intermediate crude, saw volume spike to 42 million shares, 98% above its 30-day average. Gold prices advanced 1.8% to $2,487 per ounce as investors sought safe-haven assets, while the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) jumped 22% to 19.4. Kuwait and Bahrain collectively account for over 15% of OPEC's spare production capacity and serve as critical hubs for regional energy logistics, including the 1.5 million barrel per day Kuwait Integrated Petroleum Industries Complex.
Energy sector equities outperformed the broader market, with the SPDR Energy Select Sector ETF (XLE) gaining 2.4% versus the S&P 500's decline of 0.6%. Integrated oil majors with significant regional operations, including Saudi Aramco and Kuwait Petroleum Corporation, face both upside from higher benchmark prices and downside from direct physical asset risk. Shipping rates for Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCCs) from the Persian Gulf to Asia rose 12% as insurers increased war risk premiums. A counter-argument suggests that Saudi Arabia and the UAE retain sufficient spare capacity to offset any limited supply disruption, potentially capping extreme price moves. Hedge fund positioning data from the CFTC shows managed money net long positions in WTI futures increased by 32,000 contracts in the week preceding the attacks, indicating some anticipation of geopolitical risk premium building.
The next critical catalyst is the June 13 OPEC+ meeting, where members will review production policy amid the heightened security environment. Market participants will monitor any official statement addressing security guarantees for member production facilities. Technical resistance for Brent crude now sits at the $130 psychological level, with support at the 50-day moving average of $125.37. The US Department of Energy's weekly petroleum inventory report on June 12 will provide updated data on strategic petroleum reserve levels, which currently stand at 357 million barrels. Any further missile launches confirmed by US Central Command or official communications from the Iranian Foreign Ministry will dictate near-term price action.
Kuwait's Mina al-Ahmadi port handles nearly 80% of the country's crude exports, averaging 1.7 million barrels per day, while Bahrain's Sitra terminal is a key loading point for Arab Light crude. Any successful strike on these facilities would disrupt shipments and force tankers to reroute, increasing transit times and freight costs. The attacks also risk damaging desalination plants critical for regional water supply, potentially forcing domestic energy consumption shifts that could reduce export volumes.
During the 2019 attacks on Saudi Arabia's Abqaiq facility, oil prices surged 14.6% in a single session, the largest percentage gain since the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. However, prices retreated 8.2% over the subsequent week as Saudi Aramco restored production faster than anticipated. The 2025 Ras Tanura attack saw a more sustained 18% price increase over three days due to longer repair timelines and concurrent supply outages in Libya.
The United States Oil Fund (USO) and the Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) track front-month futures contracts and show high correlation to daily geopolitical developments. The SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) tends to be more volatile due to its concentration in upstream companies with physical asset risk. The VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) often lags initial price moves but can outperform during prolonged disruptions due to increased drilling and repair demand.
Geopolitical risk premium has returned to oil markets with multi-front attacks threatening critical export infrastructure.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Navigate market volatility with professional tools
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.