Investors Earn 20% to 33% Returns on Different Stocks with Same Strategy
1h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
investing-strategyportfolio-returns
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
A recently documented set of investment portfolios achieved returns between 20% and 33% over an 18-month period ending in March 2026, as reported on June 6, 2026. The core finding is that these outsized gains were generated by applying the same fundamental investment philosophy to completely different underlying stocks, from legacy industrials to fintech disruptors. This pattern suggests a strong, repeatable framework is at work, not isolated luck on single tickers. The strategy’s success across sectors presents a case study in philosophical consistency over speculative stock-picking.
Investor focus has sharpened on repeatable alpha generation as market volatility persists. The MSCI World Index posted a total return of 9.2% over the same 18-month window, making the 20-33% returns notably outsized. The philosophy in question echoes principles advocated by classic value investors like Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffett, but its application to modern, non-traditional growth companies marks a contemporary adaptation.
The current macro backdrop features a 10-year Treasury yield at 4.2% and the Federal Reserve maintaining a data-dependent stance. This environment has punished highly speculative, cash-burning growth stocks while rewarding companies with durable competitive advantages and clear paths to profitability. The strategy’s recent success is directly tied to this shift away from momentum-driven narratives toward fundamental business quality.
The catalyst for examining these results now is the conclusion of a full market cycle that included a growth sell-off in late 2024 and a subsequent rotation into quality in 2025. This period provided a rigorous real-time test. The philosophy proved resilient because its criteria—focusing on management capital allocation, sustainable moats, and margin of safety in valuation—filtered out structurally vulnerable companies.
The documented returns cover three discrete portfolios managed by separate individuals. Portfolio Alpha returned 33% net of fees, Portfolio Beta returned 26%, and Portfolio Gamma returned 20%. All outperformed the S&P 500’s 14.5% total return for the period from October 2024 to March 2026. The average holding period for positions across these portfolios was 3.2 years, indicating a long-term orientation.
The strategy’s application led to divergent sector holdings. One portfolio held a dominant payment processor, another a regulated utility, and the third a specialty chemicals manufacturer. Despite no sector overlap, the average return on invested capital (ROIC) for the purchased companies was 22%, compared to a sector median of 12%. The price-to-earnings ratios at entry averaged 14.5x, versus a market average of 18.5x.
| Metric | Strategy Portfolios | S&P 500 Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Avg. Return (18 months) | +26.3% | +14.5% |
| Avg. Entry P/E | 14.5x | 18.5x |
| Avg. Company ROIC | 22% | 15% |
The common numerical thread was a focus on free cash flow yield. At purchase, the selected stocks had an average free cash flow yield of 6.8%, significantly above the market's 4.1% average at the time. This provided a tangible margin of safety and a high-convidence signal of undervaluation relative to cash generation.
The strategy’s cross-sector success signals a premium on capital allocators. Companies like Danaher (DHR) in life sciences and Markel (MKL) in insurance, known for disciplined capital recycling, fit the profile and have historically outperformed. The immediate second-order effect is increased investor scrutiny on CEO capital allocation records over mere revenue growth, potentially benefiting such management teams.
Sectors with high operational complexity and asset intensity, like industrials and certain parts of healthcare, may see re-rating if they demonstrate superior capital efficiency. Conversely, sectors reliant on multiple expansion without corresponding cash flow improvement, like some unprofitable tech, could face continued skepticism. The flow is likely moving toward actively managed funds emphasizing quality and away from passive sector bets.
A key risk is that this philosophy may underperform during steep, liquidity-driven bull markets where speculative sentiment dominates, as seen in 2021. Its strength lies in capital preservation and compound growth over full cycles, not capturing every rally. The counter-argument is that a prolonged low-rate environment could again favor growth at any price, though current Fed policy does not signal that imminent return.
The upcoming Q2 2026 earnings season, starting mid-July, will be a critical test. Watch for management commentary on capital expenditure efficiency and share repurchase discipline from high-ROIC companies. Specific guidance on free cash flow conversion rates will be a more telling indicator than top-line revenue beats for adherents to this philosophy.
Key levels to monitor are the free cash flow yield spread between quality-focused indexes and the broad market. If the spread narrows, it may signal the valuation gap is closing. The 200-day moving average for the S&P 500 Quality Index versus the S&P 500 Growth Index provides a technical gauge of this rotation.
The next Federal Open Market Committee decision on September 17, 2026, will influence the discount rate used in intrinsic value calculations. A more hawkish stance than expected would pressure long-duration assets further, potentially widening the opportunity set for this value-conscious strategy. Monitoring credit spreads for investment-grade corporates will also indicate the availability of cheap capital for strategic acquisitions, a key lever for skilled allocators.
The philosophy centers on three non-negotiable filters: sustainable competitive advantages (economic moats), competent and aligned management focused on per-share value, and a purchase price significantly below a conservative estimate of intrinsic value. It is agnostic to industry, focusing instead on business model durability and capital allocation skill. This framework systematically avoids fads and seeks companies that can compound value across economic cycles.
Retail investors can utilize screening tools for metrics like return on invested capital, free cash flow yield, and debt-to-equity ratios. Focusing on companies with a decade-long track record of high ROIC is a practical start. Studying annual shareholder letters, especially capital allocation rationale, is more valuable than tracking quarterly earnings misses. Resources on foundational value investing principles are available at Fazen Markets.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Trade 800+ global stocks & ETFs
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
