German Defense Chief Says China Missed Key Engagement Opportunity
0h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
china-germany-relationsshangri-la-dialogue
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Germany’s defense chief Carsten Breuer stated on 31 May 2026 that China missed a significant opportunity to engage with other nations at the political and military level during the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. The remarks, made in an interview on the sidelines of Asia’s premier defense conference, highlight growing European frustration with Beijing’s diplomatic stance. The commentary adds to a complex backdrop for global markets assessing geopolitical risk premiums.
The Shangri-La Dialogue has served as a critical barometer for Asia-Pacific security tensions since its inception in 2002. The 2024 conference featured a direct confrontation between U.S. and Chinese defense chiefs over Taiwan, underscoring the forum's volatility. Breuer’s comments mark a notable shift as Germany, a nation traditionally prioritizing trade ties with China, adopts a more assertive security voice. The German government published its first China strategy in July 2023, labeling Beijing a “partner, competitor, and systemic rival.”
European alignment with U.S. positions on Indo-Pacific security has intensified following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Germany’s recent commitment to increasing its naval presence in the region reflects this strategic pivot. The immediate catalyst for Breuer’s criticism appears to be China’s refusal to participate in certain multilateral meetings on the conference sidelines. This non-engagement occurs amid ongoing tensions in the South China Sea and European scrutiny of dual-use technology exports.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz visited China in April 2024 with a large trade delegation, emphasizing economic ties. The contrast between Scholz’s commercial overtures and Breuer’s security-focused criticism illustrates the inherent tension in Germany’s China policy. This balancing act occurs as the EU investigates Chinese subsidies for electric vehicles and considers tariffs, adding an economic dimension to the strategic friction.
Germany’s two-way trade with China reached 254 billion euros in 2023, making China Germany’s largest trading partner for the eighth consecutive year. German foreign direct investment in China hit a record 11.9 billion euros in 2022 before moderating to approximately 10.3 billion euros in 2023. The German automotive sector accounts for roughly one-third of this economic exposure, with Volkswagen AG deriving over 40% of its global deliveries from China.
European defense spending is rising in response to geopolitical pressures. NATO estimates show that 18 allies are on track to meet the 2% of GDP defense spending target in 2024, up from only 3 allies in 2014. Germany’s own defense expenditure is projected to hit the 2% threshold in 2024, a significant increase from 1.4% in 2022. The German parliament approved a 100 billion euro special fund for military modernization in 2022.
A comparative analysis of diplomatic engagement at recent defense forums reveals a trend. The number of bilateral meetings between Chinese officials and their Western counterparts at the 2024 Munich Security Conference declined by an estimated 25% compared to the 2022 event. This dataset suggests a broader pattern of selective Chinese engagement that extends beyond the Singapore forum.
Breuer’s commentary reinforces a decoupling narrative that directly impacts European industrials and automotive sectors. Companies with high revenue exposure to China, such as Volkswagen (VOW3.DE), BASF (BAS.DE), and Siemens (SIE.DE), face heightened political risk. A sustained deterioration in Sino-German relations could pressure these equities, which are already trading at discounted valuations relative to U.S. peers. The STOXX Europe 600 Autos & Parts Index has underperformed the broader STOXX 600 by 5% year-to-date.
Conversely, European defense contractors like Rheinmetall (RHM.DE) and Thales (HO.PA) may see sustained investor interest as geopolitical tensions validate increased defense budgets. Rheinmetall’s order backlog grew to 38.3 billion euros in Q1 2024, a 70% increase from the previous year. The counter-argument is that a full-scale Sino-European trade war would harm global growth, negatively affecting cyclical sectors universally. Portfolio managers are increasing hedges on European equity exposure through put options on the Euro Stoxx 50 index (STOXX50E).
The next significant catalyst is the European Parliament election on 6-9 June 2024. A strong showing for right-wing parties could harden the EU’s stance on China, framing the relationship more through a security lens. Investors should monitor the EU’s decision on provisional tariffs for Chinese electric vehicles, expected by 5 July 2024. The announcement will test the bloc’s willingness to prioritize industrial policy over trade relations.
Key technical levels for the DAX index include support at 18,400, a level that held during the March 2024 correction, and resistance near the all-time high of 18,892. A sustained break below 18,200 on escalating geopolitical headlines would signal a bearish shift in sentiment. The EUR/USD currency pair remains sensitive to trade war rhetoric, with critical support at the 1.0600 handle representing the 2024 low.
France has historically taken a more Gaullist, independent approach to China, often positioning itself as a balancing power between Washington and Beijing. President Macron has repeatedly called for European “strategic autonomy,” cautioning against becoming a U.S. follower in a Taiwan conflict. Germany’s stance, while hardening, remains more anchored to its export-oriented economic model, creating a discernible policy divergence within the EU’s two largest powers.
The automotive sector faces the highest direct exposure, with German OEMs operating numerous joint ventures and manufacturing plants in China. The chemical industry is also vulnerable; BASF has invested billions in an integrated Verbund site in Zhanjiang. Machinery and plant engineering, which constitutes Germany’s second-largest export segment to China after autos, would suffer from retaliatory tariffs, impacting companies like Siemens and Trumpf.
As of the market close on 31 May, Chinese officials had not issued a formal public response directed specifically at General Breuer. The Chinese delegation at Shangri-La, led by Defense Minister Dong Jun, focused its public remarks on promoting a “global security initiative” and criticizing “hegemonism,” a term often aimed at the U.S. The lack of a direct rebuttal may indicate Beijing is calibrating its response to avoid further alienating a key European economic partner.
Germany’s new strategic assertiveness marks a pivotal inflection point in how Europe manages its systemic rivalry with China.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Navigate market volatility with professional tools
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.