Exxon, ConocoPhillips Seek Guarantees for Venezuela Return
0h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
venezuelaconocophillips
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
American oil majors Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips are negotiating with the Venezuelan government for legal safeguards to resume operations, according to a Bloomberg report dated May 26, 2026. The discussions center on securing arbitration guarantees and protections for assets before committing to new investments. This marks the first concrete steps by U.S. supermajors to re-enter the country since the U.S. Treasury Department issued general licenses easing sanctions in late 2025. The potential return of capital and technology is viewed as critical for reversing Venezuela's protracted production decline.
The push for safeguards follows a decade of expropriation and legal disputes. In 2007, Venezuela under Hugo Chávez nationalized heavy oil projects in the Orinoco Belt, leading to protracted international arbitration. ConocoPhillips secured a $8.5 billion award in 2018, which remains partially unsettled. Exxon Mobil left the country in 2007 after its assets were seized, later winning a $1.6 billion arbitration ruling.
The macro backdrop hinges on global spare capacity and geopolitical realignment. Benchmark Brent crude trades near $82 per barrel, with OPEC+ maintaining production cuts. Venezuela sits on the world's largest proven oil reserves but produces under 900,000 barrels per day, down from over 3 million bpd in the 1990s.
The catalyst is the conditional easing of U.S. sanctions, granted in October 2025 after Venezuela agreed to electoral reforms. General License 44 allows transactions with the Venezuelan oil and gas sector for six-month periods, subject to renewal. This created a window for majors to assess the viability of returning, but political risk and the lack of a formal bilateral investment treaty have stalled commitments.
Market reaction to the geopolitical news was negative amid broader equity weakness. Exxon Mobil shares traded at $149.81 as of 22:41 UTC today, down 3.53% on the day. The stock moved within a range of $149.47 to $154.55. ConocoPhillips traded at $116.57, a decline of 3.30% from its intraday high of $119.89.
| Company | Current Price | Day's Change | 52-Week High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exxon Mobil (XOM) | $149.81 | -3.53% | ~$165 |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | $116.57 | -3.30% | ~$128 |
These declines slightly underperformed the broader energy sector, represented by the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE), which was down approximately 2.8%. Venezuela's state oil company PDVSA's estimated production sits at 880,000 bpd, a fraction of its 3.2 million bpd capacity. Analysts at JP Morgan estimate that with $20 billion in foreign investment, Venezuela could add 500,000 bpd of production within five years.
The return of Exxon and ConocoPhillips would directly benefit oilfield service providers like Schlumberger (SLB) and Halliburton (HAL), which require contracts for drilling, well workovers, and infrastructure upgrades. It would also boost suppliers of diluents, such as condensate, needed to transport Venezuela's heavy crude. Shares of midstream companies with Caribbean and Gulf Coast assets, like NuStar Energy (NS), could see renewed interest for storage and blending.
A significant risk is the conditional and revocable nature of the U.S. licenses. The Biden administration has explicitly linked license renewals to the Venezuelan government's adherence to the electoral roadmap. A reversal of sanctions would strand any new capital commitments. The counter-argument is that the majors are seeking iron-clad arbitration agreements precisely to mitigate this political risk, ensuring compensation even if projects are again interrupted.
Positioning data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shows money managers have built a net-long position in WTI crude futures. Flow is moving into long-dated options on service sector ETFs, anticipating a multi-year recovery cycle in Latin American energy projects. Short interest in pure-play Venezuelan bond ETFs remains elevated, reflecting skepticism about a smooth political transition.
The primary catalyst is the U.S. Treasury's decision on renewing General License 44, due by April 2026. A non-renewal would immediately halt all progress. Secondary catalysts include Venezuela's presidential election scheduled for July 2026 and any formal signing of arbitration agreements between the majors and PDVSA.
Key levels to watch are the 200-day moving averages for XOM ($152.50) and COP ($118.75). A sustained break above these levels could indicate market confidence in a deal being finalized. For oil prices, a break below $78 in Brent crude would reduce the economic urgency for majors to enter high-risk jurisdictions, potentially delaying final investment decisions.
Venezuela's bond prices, particularly those tied to PDVSA 2028 obligations, will be a sensitive gauge of perceived deal success. A move above 30 cents on the dollar would signal bondholder expectation of cash flow from new joint ventures.
In the immediate term, it has negligible impact as any production increase is years away. The long-term implication is an increase in global spare capacity, which could cap price rallies. If Venezuela adds 500,000 to 1 million barrels per day by 2030, it would reduce the pricing power of OPEC+ and provide a new source of heavy sour crude for U.S. Gulf Coast refineries configured for that grade.
The closest precedent is Iran after the 2015 nuclear deal. Iran added nearly 1 million bpd to the market within a year of sanctions relief. The Venezuela scenario is more complex due to severe infrastructure decay. Iran's production decline was primarily due to financial isolation, while Venezuela's collapse stems from mismanagement, lack of maintenance, and an exodus of technical personnel, requiring a much larger capital infusion.
The companies are seeking binding agreements that any future disputes will be resolved in international arbitration forums like the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. They want guarantees that profits can be repatriated and that their assets will be protected from future nationalization. A key point is securing recognition of prior arbitration awards as a credit against future tax or royalty obligations.
The success of Venezuela's oil recovery hinges on U.S. majors securing legal protections that Washington cannot unilaterally void.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Position yourself for the macro moves discussed above
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.