ETH/BTC Ratio Climbs to Highest Since January
1h ago|7 min read1Standard
Fazen Markets Research
Expert Analysis
ETH/BTCEthereum
The ETH/BTC ratio moved decisively higher on April 15, 2026, reaching its strongest level since January 2026 and signaling a tentative shift in crypto market leadership. On the same day CoinDesk reported that Ethereum's network added 284,000 new users in Q1 2026 and that stablecoin supply had climbed to a record $180 billion (CoinDesk, Apr 15, 2026). Those on-chain metrics accompanied an intraday reallocation from bitcoin to ether that traders characterized as confirmation of renewed risk appetite. Market participants and institutional desks noted the ratio's recovery reverses a multi-month underperformance for ether versus bitcoin, while liquidity in stablecoins provides a potential engine for fresh inflows. This report unpacks the data, assesses sector implications, and provides a measured view on what the move means for institutional investors and market structure.
The ETH/BTC ratio has historically been a barometer of speculative positioning within digital assets: a rising ratio implies ether outperformance relative to bitcoin, while a falling ratio signals the opposite. After a period of ether underperformance through late 2025 and early 2026, the ratio's climb in mid-April should be read against a backdrop of renewed on-chain engagement. CoinDesk's April 15, 2026 article cited 284,000 new Ethereum users in Q1 2026 and a record $180 billion of stablecoins in circulation; both are inputs that can amplify demand for ether if stablecoin holders convert into on-chain activity (CoinDesk, Apr 15, 2026). For institutional investors, the ratio provides a relative-value lens that complements absolute price analysis of BTC and ETH.
The timing matters: the ratio breaking higher after January 2026 represents a short-term technical development but also a potential regime change if supported by fundamentals such as user growth and liquidity. Comparing to prior cycles, similar rotations from BTC to ETH preceded periods of broader altcoin appreciation in 2017 and again in 2021, though those episodes were accompanied by materially higher leverage and retail FOMO. Today’s market displays different structural characteristics — larger flows from OTC desks and greater influence from institutional vehicles — which could modulate both the magnitude and speed of any subsequent move.
Institutional flows and product availability are also relevant. Spot bitcoin ETFs and evolving ether spot/futures product markets change how quickly capital can reallocate between the two assets. While bitcoin still dominates market capitalization and headlines, ether’s on-chain activity and developer ecosystem growth — evidenced by reported Q1 user additions — provide a substantive fundamental case for periodic outperformance versus bitcoin. Investors should therefore treat the ratio move as a signal to interrogate both liquidity and product-level catalysts rather than as a standalone trading trigger.
The three concrete data points driving commentary on April 15 were the ETH/BTC ratio reaching its January high, 284,000 new Ethereum users in Q1 2026, and stablecoin supply at $180 billion, all cited by CoinDesk on Apr 15, 2026. The 284,000 new-users figure implies sustained onboarding to Ethereum-based services and smart-contract activity over the first quarter; by comparison, reported onboarding rates in Q1 2025 were lower, contributing to last year’s relative underperformance of ether (CoinDesk, Apr 15, 2026). That user-growth snapshot is material: sustained net new users can support fee revenues, DeFi activity and, ultimately, token demand if participants purchase native assets for staking, gas, or collateral.
Stablecoin supply at $180 billion provides a measurable liquidity pool that can be (and historically has been) a proximate source of buy-side pressure across digital assets. The $180bn figure should be compared to prior on-chain liquidity troughs and peaks: in 2024–2025, stablecoin supply fluctuated meaningfully with regulatory flows; the latest record implies greater dry powder on-chain, which can accelerate rallies if allocation shifts occur. From a quantitative perspective, the ratio's rise coupled with elevated stablecoin balances increases the odds of a multi-asset rally, but conversion rates from stablecoins to risky assets historically vary and are sensitive to market structure, trading fees, and funding conditions.
Date-stamped reporting matters. CoinDesk published the synthesis on April 15, 2026 — a discrete event that anchors market memory and flow decisions. Technical analysis on charting platforms showed the ratio breaking a resistance band established in February–March 2026, prompting systematic strategies to de-risk or re-weight portfolios. Traders who use relative momentum triggers observed that the break above January highs met their entry criteria, while risk managers noted that volatility in cross-asset correlations has increased, complicating hedging.
A sustained period of ETH outperformance versus BTC would have meaning for derivatives desks, market-makers and custody providers. For derivatives desks, greater ether relative strength tends to increase basis and funding dislocations in ETH futures markets, as long-only demand climbs. Market-makers could face inventory pressure skewed to ether, requiring adjustments in quoting and delta-hedging costs. Custody providers and institutional platforms may see increased demand for ETH custody solutions and staking services if the outperformance persists and if net-new user metrics translate to asset purchases.
For broader crypto risk allocation, a rising ETH/BTC ratio typically decompresses correlations within the altcoin universe, often producing fat-tailed moves in mid-cap tokens that are more closely correlated to ether than to bitcoin. This pattern matters for funds running multi-asset strategies: a 1–2% portfolio shift from bitcoin to ether can cascade into larger notional rotations in altcoin exposure. Compared to the comparable period in 2025, when bitcoin captured most inflows into spot ETF products, this rotation marks a relative preference change among liquidity providers and allocators.
Regulatory and macro considerations will condition the strength of any ether-led cycle. If U.S. or EU regulators accelerate approvals for spot ether products or clarify staking-related rules, the institutional demand curve for ETH could steepen. Conversely, tightening in macro liquidity or adverse regulatory rulings could reverse the rotation rapidly, given ethereum's higher correlation to growth-sensitive risk assets. Thus sector participants should monitor product approvals, staking yields, and macro liquidity metrics alongside on-chain indicators.
The ratio’s rebound, while constructive, carries risk of false starts. Historical precedent shows that short-lived rotations have occurred when leverage or retail participation surged, only to reverse with sharper sell-offs. The current environment features a larger base of institutional capital, which can both amplify outperformance via concentrated flows and dampen volatility through greater depth; nonetheless, sudden shifts in macro liquidity or cross-border regulatory announcements remain significant tail risks. Market participants should therefore calibrate scenario analyses to include both rapid continuation and quick reversion cases.
Liquidity conditions are another immediate risk. Although stablecoin supply at $180bn represents on-chain liquidity, conversion into ether is not frictionless; slippage, OTC spreads, and exchange routing can dilute the effective buying power of that pool. In stressed markets, stablecoin holders may instead seek fiat exits or move into perceived safer assets, reducing the expected cushion for a sustained ether rally. Funding-cost spikes and basis widening in ETH futures markets could also introduce blowup risk for leveraged participants.
Lastly, protocol-specific risks remain relevant. Smart-contract exploits, network congestion, or a high-profile governance failure could damage confidence in Ethereum irrespective of macro trends. Conversely, upgrades that materially reduce fees or improve throughput could enhance ether's relative value proposition. Risk managers should model protocol-level event probabilities and their potential impact on both absolute ETH prices and the ETH/BTC ratio.
Fazen Markets views the April 15 move as an important tactical signal rather than a definitive strategic shift. The concomitant metrics — 284,000 new Q1 users and $180bn in stablecoins — improve the odds of further ether-led market breadth, yet they do not guarantee it. We note that the current on-chain liquidity pool is larger than in mid-2025, but institutional flow mechanics have become more nuanced: allocations are often mediated through OTC desks, futures-basis trades and multi-asset mandates rather than simple spot conversions. This complexity can delay or dampen the transmission of on-chain liquidity into sustained price moves.
A contrarian but data-driven viewpoint is that the recovery of the ETH/BTC ratio could presage a rotation that is stronger in breadth than in single-asset magnitude. In other words, ether may lead a period of renewed appetite for higher-beta tokens without necessarily producing a parabolic move in ETH itself. That pattern would favor multi-asset altcoin exposure and derivative structures that capture relative upside while limiting idiosyncratic downside—particularly strategies that hedge systemic tail risk via cross-asset instruments.
Operationally, Fazen Markets encourages clients to track conversion friction metrics — such as OTC spreads, on-exchange stablecoin-to-ETH slippage, and futures basis — as leading indicators of whether the on-chain liquidity is materially flowing into spot demand. Monitoring product approvals and staking regulatory guidance is equally important; incremental clarity can turn a tactical rotation into a multi-quarter reallocation. For more on market structure and execution, see our broader coverage on topic.
Q: Does the ETH/BTC ratio rising mean ETH will outperform BTC for the rest of 2026?
A: Not necessarily. A rising ratio is a relative signal indicating ether is currently outperforming bitcoin, but it does not guarantee persistent outperformance. Historical episodes in 2017 and 2021 showed rotations that either extended for months or collapsed within weeks. Key variables to watch include institutional product flows, regulatory developments, and conversion frictions from stablecoins to spot assets.
Q: How material is the $180bn stablecoin supply to price dynamics?
A: The $180 billion figure is significant as a source of potential buying power, but conversion efficiency matters. On-chain stablecoin balances can backstop rallies if a meaningful fraction converts to risky assets; however, slippage, OTC routing, and liquidity fragmentation will determine the effective buying power. Monitoring realized conversion rates and stablecoin velocity provides better forward information than the headline supply number alone.
Q: What historical precedent should investors consider when the ETH/BTC ratio shifts?
A: Prior rotations where ether outperformed often led to expanded correlation across mid-cap tokens and heightened market breadth. However, those episodes coincided with varying macro contexts and leverage profiles. The present environment, with larger institutional participation and different product availability, may produce a different path and therefore requires tailored scenario analysis.
The ETH/BTC ratio’s rise to January 2026 highs, backed by 284,000 Q1 user additions and $180bn in stablecoins (CoinDesk, Apr 15, 2026), is a meaningful tactical development that increases the probability of a broader crypto recovery but does not eliminate material tail risks. Investors should treat the move as a signal to reassess relative exposures, liquidity frictions and product-level catalysts.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
Trade the assets mentioned in this article
Trade on BybitSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.