Chris Davis on Beating the S&P, Munger's Mentorship, and Risk
1h ago|4 min readStandard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
long-term-investingvalue-investing
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
In a recent Bloomberg Masters in Business interview published June 5, 2026, Davis Funds Chairman Chris Davis discussed the principles behind his multi-decade track record of outperforming the S&P 500. The conversation centered on managing long-term risk, adapting to economic change, and the enduring influence of mentors like Berkshire Hathaway’s Charlie Munger. Davis oversees a family of funds with a collective history spanning over 50 years, applying a concentrated, patient approach to equity investing.
Markets in mid-2026 face persistent volatility, with the S&P 500's 10-year annualized return hovering near 12% and the 10-year Treasury yield at 4.2%. Short-term trading and thematic momentum often dominate retail flows, contrasting with institutional mandates for durable capital appreciation. The resurgence of interest in fundamental, business-owner investing provides a timely backdrop for Davis’s philosophy.
The catalyst for revisiting these principles is a generational shift in market leadership. The dominance of mega-cap technology stocks has compressed valuations elsewhere, creating a wider opportunity set for stock-pickers focused on durable competitive advantages. Investors are reassessing concentration risk after periods of narrow market leadership, seeking strategies designed for full market cycles.
Davis entered the family business in the 1990s, a period marked by the dot-com bubble’s inflation and subsequent burst. That experience shaped a permanent focus on valuation discipline. The last comparable period of intense focus on business quality over speculation was following the 2008-2009 Global Financial Crisis, when value strategies sharply outperformed.
The Davis New York Venture Fund, the firm’s flagship offering, has delivered an annualized return of 11.5% since its 1969 inception through April 2026. This compares to the S&P 500’s annualized return of 10.7% over the same 57-year period. The fund’s expense ratio is 0.85%, below the category average of 1.02% for U.S. large-cap blend funds.
| Metric | Davis New York Venture Fund | S&P 500 Index |
|---|---|---|
| 10-Year Ann. Return | 12.1% | 12.5% |
| 15-Year Ann. Return | 11.8% | 10.9% |
| Max Drawdown (2008) | -46.2% | -50.9% |
The fund’s assets under management total approximately $28 billion. Its portfolio typically holds between 20 and 30 stocks, a concentration far tighter than the S&P 500’s 500+ constituents or the average large-cap mutual fund’s 150 holdings. This concentration reflects high-conviction bets on companies like Berkshire Hathaway, Capital One, and New York Life’s parent company.
A sustained shift toward this quality-and-value approach would benefit sectors currently trading below historical valuation multiples. Financials, particularly insurers and diversified banks, stand to gain as higher interest rates improve net interest margins and investment income. Industrial companies with strong pricing power and global infrastructure exposure would also be re-rated.
The primary counter-argument is that a slow-growth or deflationary environment could hurt these cyclical sectors more than the resilient tech giants that have led markets. A rapid decline in long-term yields could pressure bank profitability and insurance reserve calculations, undermining a key thesis for financials.
Positioning data shows institutional investors have been net buyers of financial sector ETFs for four consecutive months, adding over $12 billion in exposure. Hedge funds have increased short interest in the most expensive quintile of the technology sector by 15% since the start of 2026, indicating a rotation trade is underway. Long-only managers are adding to positions in companies with high returns on invested capital trading at price-to-earnings ratios below the market average.
The next catalyst for the value-versus-growth debate will be the Q2 2026 earnings season, beginning in mid-July. Key reports from major banks like JPMorgan Chase and asset managers like BlackRock will signal the health of the financial sector’s core earnings. The Federal Reserve’s September policy meeting will provide critical guidance on the terminal rate path, directly affecting bank and insurance valuations.
Levels to watch include the relative performance ratio of the Russell 1000 Value Index to the Russell 1000 Growth Index. A sustained break above its 200-day moving average would confirm a durable rotation. Within financials, the KBW Bank Index must hold above the 95 support level to maintain its 2026 uptrend. The 10-year Treasury yield remaining above 4.0% is a fundamental prerequisite for the profitability of the traditional banking model.
Davis defines risk not as short-term price volatility, but as the permanent loss of capital or the failure to achieve long-term purchasing power growth. This contrasts with common metrics like beta or standard deviation. His process focuses on business risk—the durability of a company’s competitive advantages and balance sheet strength over decades. This definition aligns with the teachings of Benjamin Graham and Charlie Munger, emphasizing the owner’s perspective.
The paramount lesson from Munger was the importance of a multi-disciplinary mental model for assessing businesses and avoiding psychological misjudgments. Davis cites Munger’s emphasis on understanding incentives, recognizing one’s own circle of competence, and the critical practice of inverting problems. Munger’s influence pushed the Davis investment philosophy beyond pure statistical cheapness toward a greater emphasis on sustainable high-quality businesses, even at a fair price.
Retail investors face significant challenges replicating a highly concentrated, low-turnover strategy due to behavioral biases and lack of analytical depth. A more practical approach is using low-cost, actively managed funds with a proven long-term philosophy or constructing a core portfolio of 10-15 high-conviction stocks supplemented by broad index funds for diversification. The key is aligning holdings with a multi-decade time horizon, not quarterly performance. Resources on building a durable portfolio framework are available on Fazen Markets.
Chris Davis demonstrates that beating the market for generations requires a definition of risk centered on permanent capital loss, not temporary price swings.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Trade 800+ global stocks & ETFs
Start TradingSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.