Bitcoin Fork BIP-110 Mines Two Blocks, Then Stops Amid $64,743 BTC
0h ago|5 min read1Standard
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Trades XAUUSD on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. AiX is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
A proposed hard fork of the Bitcoin network, referenced in a report as BIP-110, briefly created a separate blockchain that mined two blocks before stopping. The event occurred on 9 August 2026, as Bitcoin traded near $64,743. The new chain inherited Bitcoin's full mining difficulty with only a sliver of hashpower, causing block times to stretch for hours. Both chains temporarily accepted identical transactions, a situation that resolves when a chain diverges on a contested transaction. The event had no discernible impact on the primary Bitcoin network's price or operations as of 05:10 UTC today, with Bitcoin's 24-hour volume at $11.97 billion.
The technical scenario of a high-difficulty fork attempting to run in parallel with Bitcoin is a known but rare network stress test. The last comparable public fork attempt with significant initial mining difficulty was Bitcoin SV's split from Bitcoin Cash in November 2018. That event involved a coordinated hashpower battle, whereas the BIP-110 event appears isolated. The current macro backdrop for crypto includes Bitcoin consolidating around the $65,000 level with a market capitalization of $1.30 trillion.
Market attention is divided between spot ETF inflows and macroeconomic indicators. The catalyst for this specific fork attempt is not public, but such events are typically triggered by a minority of nodes enforcing a divergent set of consensus rules. This could stem from a software bug, a deliberate protest, or a testing initiative. The fork's rapid cessation indicates it lacked sustained economic support or coordinated hashpower to continue validating blocks against the established difficulty.
Successful blockchain forks require miners, nodes, and holders to collectively support the new chain. Without a significant migration of hashpower, a fork inheriting Bitcoin's difficulty becomes mathematically improbable to sustain. The difficulty adjusts only after 2,016 blocks, which could take years to complete at a tiny fraction of the mainnet's hash rate. This creates a near-insurmountable barrier for any spontaneous, unplanned chain split.
The live market data shows Bitcoin's price at $64,743, down 0.35% over the prior 24-hour period. The cryptocurrency's daily trading volume was $11.97 billion. Bitcoin's total market capitalization held at $1.30 trillion, underscoring the scale of the dominant network versus the forked chain. The fork's activity represented a negligible fraction of the global hashpower securing the Bitcoin blockchain, which exceeds 500 exahashes per second.
For context, the two blocks mined on the BIP-110 chain would have generated 12.5 BTC in block rewards, valued at approximately $809,000 at current prices. This theoretical value is inaccessible on the main chain and likely unrecoverable on the defunct fork. The event's market impact is effectively zero when measured against Bitcoin's $11.97 billion daily volume. Major mining pools like Foundry USA and Antpool continue to direct all hashpower to the main Bitcoin chain.
| Metric | Bitcoin (Mainnet) | BIP-110 Fork |
|---|---|---|
| Price / Value | $64,743 | Effectively $0 |
| 24h Transaction Volume | ~$11.97B | Negligible |
| Network Hashpower | >500 EH/s | Minimal / Stopped |
| Block Production | ~10 minutes | Hours (then stopped) |
Comparatively, the broader crypto market, as measured by the CoinDesk 20 Index, showed muted movement during the fork window. This indicates the event was treated as a non-event by institutional trading desks and automated systems monitoring chain stability.
The immediate second-order effect of such a fork is a reaffirmation of Bitcoin's hashpower security model. The extreme difficulty acts as a economic moat against chain splits. No public equities or ETFs with Bitcoin exposure, such as MicroStrategy (MSTR) or the spot Bitcoin ETFs (e.g., IBIT, FBTC), showed anomalous trading activity correlated to the fork. Mining company stocks like Riot Platforms (RIOT) and Marathon Digital (MARA) also traded on broader market trends.
A key limitation in assessing the event is the lack of public data on who mined the two blocks or their motivation. Without attributed hashpower, determining if it was a deliberate test or an accidental configuration error is impossible. The counter-argument is that any successful fork, however brief, demonstrates a theoretical vulnerability. However, the practical requirement for coordinated hashpower migration makes such a vulnerability economically non-viable to exploit.
Positioning data from major exchanges shows no unusual derivatives activity or shifts in BTC holdings between wallets. Flow remained typical for a weekend session, with slight net outflows from exchanges. There is no evidence of traders taking long or short positions based on the fork event. Market sentiment, as measured by the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, was unchanged, indicating the news did not permeate retail investor consciousness.
The primary catalyst for Bitcoin remains the scheduled network difficulty adjustment expected around 20 August 2026. This adjustment is forecast to be a slight increase, reflecting sustained hashpower commitment to the main chain. The next key macroeconomic event is the U.S. CPI report on 13 August, which will influence risk assets broadly.
Technically, Bitcoin's price levels to watch include the nearest support around $63,500 and resistance near $66,000. A sustained move above $66,200 could signal a breakout from the recent consolidation range. On-chain analysts will monitor the hashpower distribution among mining pools for any signs of abnormal behavior, though none is expected. The Bitcoin network's next halving is projected for 2028, which remains the dominant long-term supply narrative.
A Bitcoin hard fork is a permanent divergence in the blockchain where nodes running updated software no longer accept blocks or transactions from older nodes. This creates two separate networks, like Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash in 2017. For a fork to survive, it must attract significant economic activity, including miners, developers, and users. The BIP-110 event was a fork attempt that lacked this support and halted quickly.
Mining difficulty automatically adjusts every 2,016 blocks to ensure a new block is produced roughly every ten minutes. If hashpower leaves the network, difficulty remains high until the next adjustment, drastically slowing block production for any splinter chain. This design makes it economically irrational for miners to attack the chain or support a rival fork unless they can command a majority of hashpower long-term.
No, a failed fork like the BIP-110 event does not affect holdings on the main Bitcoin blockchain. Your BTC remains secure on the canonical chain validated by the overwhelming majority of global hashpower. Only if you were actively running software specifically configured for the fork would there be any interaction, and even then, the defunct chain has no economic value. Always ensure your wallet software follows the most widely accepted network rules.
The BIP-110 fork attempt demonstrated Bitcoin's anti-fragility through its proof-of-work difficulty mechanism.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
AiX is our free MetaTrader 4 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. XAUUSD breakout engine.
Trade the assets mentioned in this article
Trade on BybitSponsored
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.