Berkshire Hathaway sells stake in Chevron, exits GM
Fazen Markets Editorial Desk
Collective editorial team · methodology
Vortex HFT — Free Expert Advisor
Trades XAUUSD 24/5 on autopilot. Verified Myfxbook performance. Free forever.
Risk warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The majority of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. Vortex HFT is informational software — not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Berkshire Hathaway sold its entire $21.6 billion stake in Chevron and exited its position in General Motors during the first quarter of 2026, according to a regulatory filing reported on 16 May 2026. The moves were part of a significant portfolio renovation during Greg Abel’s first three months as the conglomerate’s chief executive officer. The sales represent a decisive shift away from legacy energy and automotive holdings established under Warren Buffett.
Why Greg Abel sold Chevron
Greg Abel liquidated Berkshire’s 6.7% stake in Chevron, a position worth approximately $21.6 billion at the end of 2025. The sale removes a major legacy energy holding from the portfolio. The decision likely reflects a strategic reassessment of the long-term oil and gas sector amid the global energy transition. It signals a willingness to make large, concentrated trades that diverge from his predecessor's established holdings.
Abel’s move also freed up substantial capital for potential new investments. Berkshire’s cash pile was already near a record $189 billion at year-end 2025. The Chevron proceeds add significant dry powder. This capital could be deployed into new equity positions, used for acquisitions, or retained as Treasury bills given high short-term interest rates above 4.5%.
What the GM exit signals for Berkshire
Berkshire Hathaway completely exited its position in General Motors, selling roughly 30 million shares. The holding was valued at around $1.3 billion at the previous quarter’s end. The auto manufacturer had been in Berkshire’s portfolio for over a decade. Its removal suggests Abel is pruning legacy positions that no longer align with the firm’s strategic outlook on the automotive industry.
The sale coincides with a period of intense competition and margin pressure in the electric vehicle market. GM’s stock had underperformed the S&P 500 by more than 15 percentage points over the preceding 12 months. Exiting GM may indicate a broader skepticism toward traditional automakers navigating the EV transition. It contrasts with Berkshire’s continued, albeit reduced, holding in Chinese EV maker BYD.
How Abel’s strategy differs from Buffett’s
Greg Abel’s first-quarter actions demonstrate a more active portfolio management style. The scale and speed of the Chevron and GM divestitures are notable. Warren Buffett was known for his "forever" holding philosophy with core positions like Coca-Cola and American Express. Abel’s willingness to make large-scale exits early in his tenure marks a distinct tactical shift.
However, Abel maintained core Buffett holdings like Apple, Bank of America, and American Express. The Apple stake alone constitutes over 40% of the public equity portfolio. This continuity suggests evolution, not revolution. The strategy appears to be refining the portfolio’s edges while preserving its foundational, cash-generating pillars. Abel is applying his capital allocation expertise from running Berkshire’s energy and non-insurance operations.
A key limitation is that the 13F filing only shows holdings at quarter-end, not the exact timing or prices of the sales. The sales could have been executed gradually or in blocks, impacting the average sale price. Market reaction to the filing is also backward-looking, as the trades were completed by 31 March 2026.
What investors should watch next
Market participants will scrutinize Berkshire’s second-quarter 13F filing for new equity positions. The capital from the Chevron sale must be redeployed, retained as cash, or used for share buybacks. Any new investment above $1 billion would be a strong signal of Abel’s independent investment thesis. Sector focus, particularly in technology, finance, or industrials, will be closely analyzed.
Another area to monitor is the pace of Berkshire’s own stock repurchases. The company bought back $2.2 billion of its shares in the fourth quarter of 2025. With a larger cash balance, the buyback authorization could be used more aggressively if Abel sees the stock as undervalued. This would be a direct application of his capital allocation authority.
Did Greg Abel sell any other major stocks?
The 13F filing indicated other, smaller trims and exits beyond Chevron and GM. Specific details on other positions were not the headline focus of the initial reporting. The overall activity points to a broad review rather than isolated decisions.
Is this a bearish signal for energy stocks?
Berkshire’s sale is a specific capital allocation decision by one firm. It does not constitute a market-wide signal. Other large investors maintain substantial energy holdings based on different theses, including dividends and geopolitical supply constraints. For more on energy sector analysis, visit https://fazen.markets/en.
Will Warren Buffett still influence investments?
Warren Buffett remains Chairman of the Board and is a resource for Abel. However, regulatory filings confirm Abel now has final authority over Berkshire’s investment portfolio. This quarter’s actions demonstrate he is exercising that authority decisively.
Bottom Line
Greg Abel initiated a major portfolio overhaul by selling Berkshire's Chevron and GM stakes, signaling a strategic shift from legacy holdings.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. CFD trading carries high risk of capital loss.
Trade XAUUSD on autopilot — free Expert Advisor
Vortex HFT is our free MT4/MT5 Expert Advisor. Verified Myfxbook performance. No subscription. No fees. Trades 24/5.
Trade 800+ global stocks & ETFs
Start TradingSponsored
Ready to trade the markets?
Open a demo account in 30 seconds. No deposit required.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.