AI-Resistant 'Halo' Stocks Propel UK & EU Markets to Records

Executive summary

Investors are adopting a new mantra for the AI era: the Halo trade. Halo — short for "heavy assets, low obsolescence" — prioritizes companies with tangible, productive assets that are less vulnerable to AI-driven disruption. This rotation toward capital-intensive sectors has contributed to record highs in UK and European equity indices through February 2026.

Key datapoints: a basket of more than 100 high-capex companies has outperformed a comparable group of capital-light firms by 35% since 2025; the FTSE 100 recorded its eighth consecutive monthly gain and posted its strongest month in February since November 2022; the pan-European Stoxx 600 also hit record highs. Shipping and industrial names have posted outsized year-to-date gains (a tanker company is up 57% and a high-tech industrial group is up 46% year-to-date).

What is the Halo trade?

• Definition: Halo stands for "heavy assets, low obsolescence."
• Core idea: Favor firms with substantial physical capital and long-lived economic relevance over capital-light, software- or data-dependent businesses.
• Typical Halo sectors: utilities, regulated networks, pipelines, ports, shipping, mining, energy infrastructure, long-cycle industrials and critical machinery.

Why it matters now: After a period of extended under-investment in physical assets, a strategic pivot back to infrastructure and capex increases the relative value of asset-intensive businesses. Where barriers to replication are high (cost, regulation, engineering complexity, time to build), asset ownership supports durable cash flows and defensible margins.

Market moves and verified figures

• Relative performance: A diversified basket of 100+ high-capex companies has outperformed a matched set of capital-light firms by 35% since 2025.
• UK equities: The FTSE 100 reached a series of record highs through February 2026, recording its eighth straight monthly gain and producing its strongest February since November 2022.
• Pan-European equities: The Stoxx 600 hit record levels amid sector rotation away from US technology names.
• Notable winners: A major oil-tanker shipping company has risen 57% year-to-date; a Norway-based industrial systems supplier has gained 46% since January.

These concrete movements reflect a broad rotation from growth- and AI-exposed stocks into sectors where physical capital and regulated cash flows underpin earnings expectations.

Why valuations are shifting

• Valuation gap narrowing: Capital-intensive companies in Europe have seen their price-to-earnings (P/E) premium improve relative to capital-light peers. That shift reflects changing investor preferences for tangible earnings durability over high growth prospects vulnerable to AI-driven disruption.
• Earnings quality: Asset-heavy firms often generate predictable, contract- or regulation-backed revenues that support higher multiple re-rating when risk appetite shifts toward reliability.

Sector examples and portfolio implications

• Energy & utilities: Regulated networks and integrated energy firms benefit from predictable cash flows, long asset lives and inflation-linked pricing mechanisms in many jurisdictions.
• Transport & shipping: Control of physical supply chains and fleet assets can convert cyclical upswings into sustained returns, as shown by double-digit YTD recoveries in shipping names.
• Industrials & machinery: Long-cycle capital projects and specialized equipment create high barriers to entry and recurring aftermarket revenues.

Portfolio actions for institutional investors and traders:

• Reweight exposure toward capital-intensive sectors where long-term asset utility is clear.
• Stress-test earnings models for AI-related downside in software and data revenue streams.
• Monitor balance-sheet quality: capital intensity must be supported by disciplined capex and strong free cash flow generation.

Risks and counterarguments

• Cyclical exposure: Many Halo sectors remain cyclical and sensitive to trade, commodity prices and interest-rate moves. Capital intensity does not eliminate macro risk.
• Execution risk: Large capex programs can suffer overruns or delays; asset quality and regulatory environment matter.
• Valuation complacency: The re-rating of capital-intensive stocks could overshoot fundamentals if investors underprice macro or sector-specific risks.

Additional market noise: In recent weeks, speculative scenarios imagining severe macro disruption from autonomous AI systems have circulated, increasing headline volatility. Such scenarios can amplify rotations and sentiment swings even if they are not the market's base case.

Ticker and index implications

• FTSE (FTSE 100): Well positioned to benefit from inflows into Halo sectors because of its structural weight in energy, mining and other asset-heavy industries.
• Stoxx 600: Record highs reflect a broader European rotation into capital-intensive names.
• AI / tech exposure: US mega-cap and software-focused groups have experienced relative weakness as part of the rotation into real-economy assets.

Practical checklist for analysts and portfolio managers

• Quantify asset intensity: compare capex to revenue and fixed-asset turnover across peers.
• Reassess P/E drivers: isolate recurring regulated or contract revenues from discretionary software/service revenues.
• Scenario-test: model downside to software revenues from AI adoption and upside to asset returns from improving industrial activity.
• Monitor capital allocation: prioritize firms with disciplined capex, strong FCF conversion and clear maintenance vs. growth investment splits.

Conclusion

The Halo trade reframes the investment debate for 2026: in an environment where AI accelerates structural change, tangible assets with long economic lives are commanding renewed investor attention. Verified performance gaps and record index levels in the UK and Europe show this rotation is already priced in to parts of the market. For institutional investors, the opportunity is to combine valuation discipline with detailed asset-quality and cash-flow analysis to separate durable Halo winners from cyclical or execution-risk prone companies.